Laserfiche WebLink
plan with the stipulation that ,t wort. plan addendur�n hL prepared descrtbtn installation of <br /> • 1 p 13 g <br /> idditional borings to those proposed in the work plan and grab sampling of the Herman & <br /> 1 iclen " Marina di Inking water sourLe ( ondor subsequently prepared the Work Plan -frldenclum <br /> d ited hili 9 f()()8 In a fa,, dated lily 2-11 1998 Mr Ron Rowe approved the work pian <br /> ,rcldcndunt adding that both thL IaLrhty prc-treated drinking water and the post-treatment water <br /> ,hnuld f1L sampled .ind analy/Ld by appropriate methods <br /> ( )n June 26 1998 a ( ondoi representau'sL �\,as on Site to LonduLt quarterly groundwater <br /> monitoring I tboiatory drldlysLS of groundwater satnplLS LO]IeLted from the "rte monitor wells <br /> indrLd(Ld that 13 11 `C TP1I-(i and thL SLIcLtLd gasoline cwv-enates/additives were not detLLted at <br /> OF abo\L ihL laboratory rLportcd detection limits 1:1 thL sample Lollccted trom MW-1 I thanol <br /> tLrtlar\-hrnanc}I DIPI and F FBF were not detected at or above the laboratory reported detection <br /> limits in an\ of the aioundAatLF Samples I AMP was detected nn the samples c,ollccted from <br /> ti1W-2 and 1/1W_3 M7 BI was deteLted in the samples cnllected from MW-2, MW-3 and \4W- <br /> 113 13 1 f X amt i Pll-G werL not detected at or above raised laboratory detection lit-nits in the <br /> S,ur1pILS collLctcd frorn 1\4W-2 and MW-1 Relatively low Loncentrattons of henzene ctllyl <br /> hcnZLnL total ry[Lnes and I PII-(, were detected in the, .ample collected tram MW-4 Iolucne <br /> NAZIS not detected at or above a raised laboratory detection limit in the sample collected from this <br /> well I Ioatrng product or ShLens were not observed in the groundwater removed from the <br /> monitor wells A slight petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted in the groundwater sample <br /> coliccted from MW-2 <br /> I aboratory analytical results of the g.toundwatcr samples collected during tine second gttar-ter <br /> 1998 monrtorrng eNLnt were generally consistent with historical quarterly groundwater analytical <br /> data ( oncLrrtratrons of M FBI dLtccted in the samples collected from MW-2 and MW-3 on June <br /> 26 1998 appeared to reverse a trend of mLreas:ng Lonctntratrons historically detected in samples <br /> LollLctcd from thesL wLI1S <br /> Groundwater LILvatron mLasurcments coIILLtLd at the s:tL :Tlonrtor wells on June 26 1998 <br /> indicated that thL average depth from the ground Surface to groundwater was approxrmatLly 5 <br /> flet [lie average depth to water at the site was Lssenttal ly the same on March 27, 1998 and June <br /> 26 1998 Groundwater elevation contours estimated using the depth-to-water measurements <br /> Lallected on June 26 1998 indicated that the groundwater gradient at the site was generally <br /> Lonsistent with thL estimated gradient on September I8 1997 December 31 1997 and March <br />' 27 1998 <br /> On September 30 1998 a Condor representative was on site to conduct quarterly groundwater <br /> monitoring aLt:vrtres Laboratory analyses of groundwater samples collected from thL site <br /> momtoi wells :ndrcatLd that B TFX TPIi-G and the selected gasoline oxygenates/additives were <br /> not deteLted at or above the laboratory reported detection Iii-nits in the sample collected from <br /> I M W-1 I thanol tertiary-butanol, DI PI_ and LTBE were not detected at or above the laboratory <br /> reported deteLtron hi-nits in any of the groundwater samples The laboratory reported detection <br /> limits were raised for the groundwater samples collected from MW-2 and MW-3 due to relatively <br /> high LoncLntratrons of MTBE in the groundwater samples collected from those wells (as <br /> described below) TAME was detected in the groundwater samples collected from MW-2 and <br /> MW-3 MTBE was detected in the groundwater samples collected from MW-2, MW-3 and <br /> MW-4 Benzene ethyl benzene total xylenes, and TPH-G were not detected at or above raised <br /> laboratory ieported detection limits in the groundwater sample collected from MW-2 A low <br /> concentration of toluene was detected in the groundwater sample collected from MW-2 B FEX <br /> and 11`1-1-6 were not detected at or above the laboratory reported deteLtron limits in the <br /> groundwatL: sample collected from MW-3 The laboratory detection limits associated with the <br />