Laserfiche WebLink
• 30 January 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 01-0865 <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> The elevation of ground water in each well was calculated by subtracting the depth to ground water <br /> from the surveyed well casing elevation(Table 1) The depth to ground water ranged from 0 50 feet <br /> (MW-7) to 22 85 feet (MW-11)below the tops of the well casings Ground water elevations at the <br /> site ranged from 3 17 feet above mean sea level(MSL)in well MW-12 to 16 45 feet below MSL in <br /> well EW-1, relative to the September 2003 monitoring event, ground water elevation increased in <br /> all first water and deep-screened wells,the average ground water elevation at the site was 13 32 feet <br /> below MSL, which represents an overall elevation increase of approximately 1 54 feet between the <br /> September 2003 and December 2003 sampling events <br /> The ground water flow direction of first ground water on 31 December 2003 was inferred to be <br /> towards the southeast under an average ground water gradient of approximately 0 25 foot/foot in the <br /> central portion of the levee (former USTs location), rotating to a more easterly flow with a lower <br /> gradient of 0 085 foot/foot toward the northern part of the site (Figure 3) At the eastern portion of <br /> the site, the flow direction rotates to a more southerly direction and the gradient decreases to <br /> approximately 0 027 foot/foot The dominate gradient direction remains southeast,while the central <br /> component of the gradient at the levee is very steep, dropping one foot of elevation for every four <br /> lateral feet <br /> The ground water flow inferred from deep-screened (50 feet to 60 feet bsg) wells MW-6 through <br /> MW-8 and MW-1 I atop the levee (70 feet to 80 feet bsg) was east, but under a much shallower <br /> average gradient of 0 005 foot/foot(Figure 4) The gradient remained very similar to the September <br /> 2003 gradient, though the direction did shift slightly north <br /> The ground water at the site is very dynamic and can be influenced greatly by seasonal variations, <br /> tidal effect and human influences (e g island draining pumps) <br /> 3 2 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g was detected in the water samples collected from wells MW-2 through MW-6 and EW-1 at <br /> concentrations ranging from of 820 micrograms per liter(µg/1)(MW-4)to 76,000 µg/l(MW-2) An <br /> iso-concentration map illustrating the approximate distnbution of dissolved TPH-g is depicted on <br /> Figure 5 <br /> One or more BTEX compounds were detected in the samples collected from wells MW-2 through <br /> MW-6 at the following maximum concentrations 55 µg/1 benzene (MW-2), 120 µg/1 toluene <br /> (MW-2), 12 µg/l ethylbenzene (MW-4) and 91 µg/1 xylenes (MW-4) An iso-concentration map <br /> showing the approximate distribution of dissolved benzene is provided in Figure 7 <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />