Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> W3 <br /> 4kPA t <br /> therefore, steady state conditions were reached during this <br /> test. <br /> UsI .g the slope of the semilog straight line for observation <br /> well VP-3 (Figure 5) during z!- VP-2 test gives: <br /> k=6.6.10'`cm==280darcys <br /> and <br /> 4.�CPaCCa.0011, <br /> suggesting steady state conditions were not quite reached at <br /> a radius .of 39 feat from the extraction well. <br /> Using the data from observation well MW-1 (Figure 6) during <br /> the VP-2 test: ` <br /> rad f - <br /> ..— k=3 57 daxcys <br /> and <br /> x r 20 <br /> 002 <br /> 4kPAt <br /> suggesting steady state was not achieved at <br /> M 1. �p ft. in well ` <br /> �- <br /> f Similar analysis was .,erformed using observations wells VP2, <br /> VP3, and MWI during the 36 CFM constant rate test of well VPI. <br /> The following results were observed: <br /> r _ <br /> From the observation well VP-2 data (Figure 7): <br /> k=303darcys, <br /> -� WPAO52c.WP <br /> - <br />