Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> and <br /> �kP tt'.00015, <br /> A <br /> indicating steady state conditions were achieved even di+ring <br /> this shorter test period. <br /> p.. <br /> i From the observation well VP-3 data (Figure 8): <br /> r <br /> 1c-605darcys <br /> and steady state was not achieved. <br /> From the observation well MW-1 data (FIgure 9); <br /> k-303darcys <br /> and steady state conditions were achieved. <br /> 2.0 CALCULATION OF STEADY STATE RADIUS OF INFLUENCE <br /> F Because steady state conditions were achieved for at least one _ <br /> well in each of the constant rate tests, the steady state <br /> i solution to the equation of flow was used to calculate the <br /> F radius of influence for each extraction well (Johnson and <br /> _ Others, 1990)? The radius of influence. (where P - Pte) is <br /> calculated using_ <br /> { Pi2 P.=(PA-P,2,) lri(( / W) <br /> i <br /> ; <br /> where, RL radius of influence <br /> R„ radius of well <br /> For well VP2, RL - 29 ft <br /> For well VP1, RL - 27 ft <br /> J urRas�o..rg <br /> y% <br />