Laserfiche WebLink
Mr Knoll <br /> February 19, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br />' Regional groundwater flow has been toward large pumping cones located in the northwest region of Stockton <br /> Historically, groundwater was encountered at approximately 40 feet below ground surface (bgs)at the site(San <br /> Joaquin County, 1996) Groundwater was not found within 40 feet of the surface during previous work at the <br />' site in 1995 (RMI, 1995) Groundwater levels may have changed since 1995 work and the 1996 mapping due <br /> to changes in regional withdrawal of groundwater and precipitation Seasonally, shallow groundwater flow <br /> may be altered by the influence of the San Joaqwn River <br />' Two public supply wells exist within a 1 mile radius of the site, however these wells have been inactive for <br /> the last 20 years due to poor water quality (Mar, 1999) The poor water quality was caused by the overdraft <br /> of the groundwater basin which induced the movement of poor quality water resulting from the Delta sediments <br />' eastward near the City of Stockton(DV,/R, 1980) <br /> SITE HISTORY <br />' According to information provided by BFS, the site was used as a gasoline station during the 1920s and 1930s <br /> After this period the site was used as a retail bre and automotive service business In 1967 four USTs(Tanks <br /> No 1 through 4) were closed in place by filling the tanks with sand At that time, closure for the in-place <br />' tanks was granted by the Stockton Fire Department In 1991 twelve USTs, including one of the previously <br /> closed in-place tanks, were removed from the site (Figure 2) Ryan Murphy, Inc (RW remediated the soil <br /> surrounding Tanks No 4 and 5 using soil vapor extraction during 1994 and 1995 Environmental site closure <br /> was received from the SJCPHS-EHD in November 30, 1995 <br /> In May 1997, during a property transfer site assessment, four slant soil borings were drilled at the site by <br /> Foothill Engineering in the area of the previously closed in place Tanks No 1 through 3 (Figure 2) Soil <br /> samples from two of the four soil borings near Tank No 3 contained petroleum hydrocarbons at depths of 20 <br /> and 25 feet Total Petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) concentrations of 16,200 and 1,160 milligrams per <br /> kilogram(mg/kg) were detected at 20 feet in soil samples from bormgs PBI and P132, respectively Toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and total xylenes were also detected in soil from boring PBI at concentrations of 49 2, 308, and <br /> 1,920 mg/kg, respectively Analytical results from the property transfer site assessment are summarized in <br /> Table 1 During this assessment, no groundwater samples were collected and the report stated that <br /> groundwater was not encountered however soil sample PB2 at 25 feet was described as wet Foothill <br /> Engineering concluded that samples collected near the south tank indicated the presence of aged gasoline <br /> (Foothill Engineering, 1997) Due to the detected concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons from the May <br /> 1 1997 assessment, the County requested additional assessment surrounding Tank No 3 Refer to Figure 2 for <br /> soil boring locations <br />' SITE ASSESSMENT WORK PERFORMED <br /> On October 9, 1998, QST submitted a workplan to SJCPHS-EHD for additional assessment which proposed <br /> the advancement of two soil borings, one to the west of Tank No 3 and the other south of Tank No 3 The <br /> proposed soil bonngs were to be drilled to a depth of 35 feet bgs and soil and groundwater samples were to <br />' be collected for laboratory analysis The samples were to be analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons and their <br /> constituents and oxygenate additives An encroachment permit for the proposed boring to the west of the Tank <br /> No 3 was denied by the City of Stockton The relocation of one of the proposed bormgs to the east of Tank <br />' No 3 was approved by Harlan Knoll of the SJCPHS-END <br />