Laserfiche WebLink
. 23 April 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0142 <br /> Page 3of16 <br /> • On 10, 11 and 12 January 2000 ground water monitoring wells MW-7 and MW-8 were <br /> installed on-site, after a failed sanitary seal (grout) had penetrated the transition seal <br /> (bentonite) and infiltrated the sand filter pack <br /> • To date a total of 18 ground water monitoring events have occurred at the site <br /> Assessment activities at the site to date indicate that <br /> • The vadose zone at the site is composed of fine grained sediments,below the water table,the <br /> hydrologic structure is composed primarily of fine grained sediments with discontinuous <br /> sand units <br /> • The majority of the unsaturated, hydrocarbon-impacted soil resides below former UST <br /> TK1-90, to a depth of 30 feet below surface grade (bsg) Saturated hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soil extends to a depth of 80 feet bsg, however, below 40 feet bsg, hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations generally decrease with depth The mass of hydrocarbons in the unsaturated <br /> soil is greater than the saturated soil (Figures 3a and 3b) <br /> • The highest concentration of hydrocarbon-impacted ground water has remained below <br /> former UST TK 1-90 The maximum benzene concentration was 41,000 micrograms per liter <br /> (4g11), detected in a water sample from vapor extraction well VW-1, located at the former <br /> UST area <br /> • TPH-g and BTEX concentrations have steadily declined in the ground water samples <br /> collected from the deep screened well MW-6 (screened 70 to 80 feet bsg), located at the <br /> former UST TK1-90 area, the benzene concentration detected on 28 January 2002 was <br /> 2 1 µg/1 compared to the initial value of 7,000 µg/1 detected on 11 December 1998 <br /> • The lateral extent of hydrocarbon-impacted ground water has been assessed down-gradient <br /> and cross-gradient of the former UST area(Figure 2) <br /> 2 4 FEASIBILITY TESTING OF ON-SITE GROUND WATER EXTRACTION <br /> In Corrective Action Plan - November 1995, dated 15 November 1995, AGE recommended <br /> implementation of soil vapor extraction in conjunction with in-situ air sparging for remediation of <br /> the petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water at the site At the time the CAP was <br /> prepared,ground water extraction was generally not viewed as an effective and cost efficient method <br /> of ground water remediation,but this method has gained more favor recently as a method to address <br /> impacted ground water when other technologies (e g , air-sparging) may not be controllable or <br /> effective, due in part to reduced extracted water treatment and disposal costs <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironrnental,Inc <br />