My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007812
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
632
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0505525
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2019 5:40:13 PM
Creation date
7/15/2019 4:29:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007812
RECORD_ID
PR0505525
PE
2953
FACILITY_ID
FA0002387
FACILITY_NAME
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
632
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14907033
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
632 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> s31 January 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0128 <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />' bottom of the boring to a point approximately two feet above the top of the screen Following filter <br /> pack placement, a surge block was inserted into the well casing and was alternately raised and , <br /> lowered(sui ged)i epeatedly for approximately 20 minutes to settle the filter pack material A nominal <br />' two-foot seal of bentonite pellets was placed above the filter pack and allowed to hydrate with clean <br /> tap water The remaining annular space was backfilled with portland cement An as-built well- <br /> construction diagi am is Included as Appendix A <br /> 23 WELL DEVELOPMENT <br /> On 13 July 2001 wells EW-1 and EW--2 were developed utilizing a stainless steel hand bailer,4-inch <br /> diameter PVC hand bailer Approximately 60 gallons of ground water were pui ged from wells until <br /> the ground water produced was visually sediment free Purged gi ound water was collected from the <br /> wells to a pi operly labeled DOT-apps oved model 17H 55-gallon drum and was stored at the site The <br /> field log for well development activities is included in Appendix B <br />�. 2 4 SOIL SAMPLE ANALYSIS <br /> Thi ee soil sample fi om the site was submitted for geotechnical analysis The samples were <br /> transported to Copper Testing Laboratory (CTL) of Mountain View, California and were analyzed <br /> foi poi osity and permeability in accordance with ASTM Method D5084 <br /> r <br />' 3.0. GROUND WATER EXTRACTION TEST <br /> On 18 October 2001, a twelve-hour aquifer pump test was performed at the site to assess the genei al <br /> aquifer characteristics and to assess aquifer response to ground water extraction at a constant <br /> pumping s ate utilizing well EW-1 for groundwater extraction and wells EW-2, MW-3, MW-4, <br /> MW-5, and MW-6 and vapor well VW-1 to VW-4 as observation wells Two extracted ground water <br /> samples were collected and purged ground water was containerized in an on-site 6,500-gallon poly <br /> tank (Baker tank) <br /> 3 1 AQUIFER TEST, 18 OCTOBER 2001 <br /> The ground watei extraction test consisted of extracting ground watei from well EW-1 at a rate of <br /> 5 gallons per minute (GPM) Ground water was exti acted fi om the ripper water table, the depth to <br />' ground water was within the screened interval of the extraction well <br /> 9dvanced CeuEuvironmental inc , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.