My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007812
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
632
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0505525
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0007812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2019 5:40:13 PM
Creation date
7/15/2019 4:29:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007812
RECORD_ID
PR0505525
PE
2953
FACILITY_ID
FA0002387
FACILITY_NAME
KEYSTONE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES INC
STREET_NUMBER
632
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14907033
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
632 S EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k <br />' 31 January 2002 <br />' AGE-NC Project No 95-0128 <br /> Page 5 of 8 <br />' An intercept of the no influence edge of the semi-loganthrmc plot of draw-down m-observation wells <br /> versus distance from the exti action point equals 100 feet the distance commonly thought of as the <br /> radius of influence (Appendix F) Utilizing the parameters noted above and site specific <br />' characteristics, AGE calculated that the extraction wells pumped at five gallons per minute would <br /> have a capture zone extending five feet down gradient, eight feet in each cross gradient direction, <br /> expanding up to fifteen feet in each direction perpendicular to the flow direction approximately, <br />' seventy-five feet up gradient from the pumping well Figure 3 shows the calculated capture zone for <br /> well EW-1 Calculations are shown in Appendix G <br /> 3 2 EXTRACTED WATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES <br />' Approximately 4,100 gallons ofpurged water were generated during the pump test During the pump <br /> test, two sets of a grab samples were collected prior to discharge into the tank utilizing three 40-m1 <br /> EPA-approved volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydiochlonc acid as a <br /> sample preservative The samples were collected at 1 30 prri(5 hour interval) and at the termination <br /> of the test 7 00 pm(12 hour interval ) <br /> lie Following sample collection, each preserved sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed <br /> in a chilled container and transported to a California Department of Health Services(DHS)-certified <br />' laboratory for analysis foi <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively) by EPA Method 8015 Modified, and <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene(BTEX) and methyl-tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) <br /> by EPA Method 8020 <br />' 3 3 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF EXTRACTED WATER <br /> The 1 esults of the laboratory analysis of the two extracted ground water samples included TPH-g <br />' ranging from 22,000 rnrcrograms per liter([ig/1) up to 26,000 dug/l BTEX compounds were detected <br /> at concenti ations as high as 3,900 �ig/l(benzene) Analytical results of samples are summarized on <br /> Table 3 The laboratory reports (McCampbell Analytical Inc Lab I D 81657 to 81658), Quality <br /> Assurance and Quality Control data and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix H <br />' 3 4 PURGED GROUND WATER DISPOSAL <br />' On 31 October 2001, the ground water extracted during the pumping test was pumped from the <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental Inc <br /> f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.