Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Lori Duncan <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> (. well MW3 was measured using an electronic water/hydrocarbon interface probe <br /> Groundwater elevations were calculated by subtracting the measured depth to groundwater in each well <br /> from the respective wellhead elevation The depth to groundwater in the wells on September 19, 2002 <br /> ranged from 24 13 to 24 84 feet below ground surface (bgs) Groundwater fell an average of 1 55 <br /> feet in site wells between June 10, 2002 and September 19, 2002 The calculated groundwater <br /> gradient for September 19, 2002 was 0 0027, or approximately 14 5 feet per mile, toward the <br /> northeast A potentiometric surface map for September 19, 2002 is shown on Figure 2 Groundwater <br /> monitoring data are summarized in Table 2 Monitoring data sheets are included in Attachment B <br /> Groundwater Sampling <br /> Due to the presence of free product in well MW3, groundwater samples were only collected from <br /> wells MW 1, MW2 and MW4 A minimum of three well casing volumes of water was purged from <br /> each well using a bailer prior to collecting groundwater samples The physical parameters of <br /> temperature, pH and electrical conductivity were measured during the purging process All downhole <br /> equipment was decontaminated between wells using a solution of laboratory-grade detergent, then <br /> double rinsing in separate containers of clean rinse water <br /> Groundwater samples were collected using dedicated, disposable bailers after the physical parameters <br /> had stabilized and water levels recovered to within 80% of their pre-purged levels The samples were <br /> placed into an ice chest refrigerated to approximately 4°C and transported to Argon Laboratories <br /> (ELAP #2359) under chain of custody protocol Well purge logs are included in Attachment B <br /> GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs, including oxygenated gasoline additives and the lead <br /> scavengers 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) using EPA method 8260B <br /> No samples were collected from well MW3 due to the presence of free product <br /> PCE was detected in wells MW1, MW2, and MW4 at concentrations of 16 parts per billion (ppb), 14 <br /> ppb, and 15 ppb, respectively Chloroform was detected in wells MW2 and MW4 at 2 3 ppb and 2 8 <br /> ppb, respectively Cis-1,2-dichlorethene (cis-1,2-13CE) and trichloroethene (TCE) were detected in <br /> well MW1 at 2 8 ppb and 3 5 ppb, respectively No cis-1,2-DCE or TCE were detected in wells <br /> MW2 or MW4 Concentrations of chloroform, TCE and cis-1,2 DCE detected at the site remain <br /> below their respective primary Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLS) of 80 ppb, 5 ppb and 6 ppb, as <br /> established by the State of California Department of Health Services PCE was present at levels <br /> exceeding its primary MCL of 5 0 ppb in all site wells, however No oxygenated gasoline additives, <br /> EDB or 1,2-DCA was detected in the groundwater samples collected from wells MW 1, MW2, or <br /> MW4 <br /> Groundwater analytical results are summarized on Table 3 Attachment C contains laboratory reports <br /> and chain of custody documentation <br /> G1Data1GROUNDZEIGABBARDIreports13QM2002 doc <br />