Laserfiche WebLink
r1�2 fL <br /> Ms Lori Duncan <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> 22 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Water Ievel elevations were monitored in wells MW 1 through MW7 on December 4, 2003 The depth to <br /> water and depth to product in well MW3 were measured using an electronic water/hydrocarbon interface <br /> probe Depths to water in other site wells were measured using an electronic water level indicator <br /> Groundwater elevations were calculated by subtracting the measured depth to groundwater in each well <br /> from the respective wellhead elevation The depth to groundwater in the wells on December 4, 2003 ranged <br /> from 25 97 feet below the top of the well casing (btoc) in well MW3 to 27 02 feet btoc in well MW5 <br /> Groundwater flowed in a northeasterly direction with a calculated gradient of 0 0035 feet per foot <br /> (approximately 18 5 feet per mile) A potentiometric surface map for Dece 4, 2003 is shown on Figure 2 <br /> Groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 2 Monitoring data sheets are included in <br /> Attachment 2 <br /> 2.3 Well Purging <br /> An experienced Ground Zero technician purged wells MW1 through MW7 on December 4, 2003 using <br /> dedicated, disposable bailers The technician purged a minimum of three well casing volumes of water from <br /> each well and measured physical parameters of temperature, pH and electrical conductivity during the <br /> purging process Purging was terminated at each well after the measured parameters stabilized <br /> All downhole equipment was decontaminated between wells by washing with a solution of laboratory-grade <br /> detergent, and then double rinsing with clean rinse water <br /> 2.4 Groundwater Sampling <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from each well after physical parameters had stabilized and the water <br /> in the well had recovered to at least 80% of pre-purge levels Samples were placed in an ice chest at a <br /> temperature of 4° Centigrade and submitted to Argon Laboratory under chain of custody protocol <br /> The samples were analyzed for the presence of TPHg, TPHd, BTEX, and VOCs pursuant to the existing <br /> groundwater monitoring and sampling program Field development/purge logs are included in Attachment <br /> 2 <br /> 3.0 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> All groundwater samples were analyzed for TPHg and TPHd using EPA method 8015B, BTEX using EPA <br /> 8021 B, and VOCs and oxygenated gasoline additives using EPA 8260B <br /> Tetrachloroethene (PCE) was detected in wells MW1, MW2, MW4, MW5, MW7, and MW7 at <br /> concentrations of 12 parts per billion (ppb), 9 4 ppb, 7 4 ppb, 5 0 ppb, 34 ppb, and 77 ppb, respectively No <br /> PCE was detected in well MW3 (<20 ppb) Cis-1,2-dichloroethene (cis-1,2-DCE) ranged from <0 5 ppb in <br /> well MW5 to l9 ppb m well MW3 Chloroform ranged from 13 ppb in well MW5 to 4 2 ppb in well MW 1, <br /> but was not detected in well MW3 at a detection limit of 2 0 ppb Trichloroethene (TCE) was detected in <br /> wells MWI, MW2, MW3, MW6, and MW7, ranging from 0 7 ppb in well MW2 to 5 8 ppb in well MW3 <br /> No petroleum hydrocarbons or gasoline additives were detected above method detection limits in <br /> groundwater samples collected from any site well, except well MW3 Well MW3 contained TPHg at 1,600 <br /> ppb, benzene at 14 ppb, toluene at 39 ppb, ethylbenzene at 18 ppb, and xylenes at 86 ppb Well MW3 also <br /> contained several additional VOCs <br /> GIGROUNDZEIGABBARDIreports\QMR1200314QM2003 doe <br />