Laserfiche WebLink
1. y <br /> _ ly <br /> , <br /> t F <br /> 21 December 1999 F <br /> `i AGE-NC Project No 98-0426 , <br /> Page 2 of 6 _ <br /> F <br /> McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI), a State of Califorriia Department of Health Services (DHS)- <br /> certified analytical laboratory t <br /> 22 LOGGING <br /> 11 J 1 i <br /> Soil was extruded from a second brass sleeve and screened for the presence of organic vapor using <br /> ' an organic vapor meter,equipped with a photo-ionization detector (PID Thermo Environmental <br /> 580A, 10 0 eV, calibrated to isobutylene), and the readings were recorded on the boring log The soil <br />' was then visually described in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System(see Appendix <br /> A -Boring Logs) <br /> 2 3 WELL AND BORING COMPLETION <br /> IBorings MW 1, MW2, and MW3 were completed as ground water monitoring wells using two-inch <br /> diameter PVC casing with 0 020-inch slotted screen installed from 35 feet to 15 feet bsg with blank <br /> casing extended to the surface The filter pack(No 3 Lonestar sand) was installed from 35 feet to <br /> • approximately 13 feef big The wells were then developed'uging a surge block to settle the sand <br /> pack A 2-foot bentonite pellet plug was then installed above the filter pack and hydrated The wells <br /> were then grouted to near the surface with portland cement Water-tight, traffic-rated well boxes <br /> were then installed over the wells <br /> 1 <br /> I j <br /> 1 , <br /> 2 4' "LABORATORY ANALYSES OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> Selected soil samples were analyzed for <br /> 1 , <br /> � 1 , <br /> 4 Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA'S ' <br />' Methods 5030/8015m, and <br /> • Volatile aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes, BTEX) <br /> in accordance with EPA Method 8020 ' <br /> I <br /> r <br /> 1 <br /> 25 MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES , <br /> On 26 October 1999, a Sohnst water level meter was used to measure the l depth to ground water in <br /> the three wells relative to the tops of the well casings The ground water elevations and gradient were <br /> • determined from these data(Table 1) ' <br /> r ' Advanced GeoEnviron mental,Inc <br /> 1 MI <br /> 1 <br /> � la <br /> ` r <br />