Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 03 <br /> Section II Closures <br /> In addition, the following information and appropriate data for Appendix A <br /> shall be submitted when evaluating Case 2 Closures. All cond)tions listed in <br /> Case #2 (page 9) must be met E <br /> SITE HISTORY <br /> 1 . Describe the size, age, condition, use, and type of tank removed, and <br /> submit a map showing the former tank system and existing buildings on <br /> site. <br /> 2 Submit an evaluation of the inventory records reviewed for the three <br /> months prior to removal in order to estimate the quantity of product <br /> released. <br /> 3. Submit a summary of past site information, such as precision test <br /> results, tank repairs or construction activities. <br /> 4. What types of businesses operated aL this site previously? <br /> 5. What was the product volume pumped per month for each tank? <br /> 6. Submit a survey of nearby wells <br /> 7. list other sources of site specific information checked (e.g. Utility <br /> Company, Public Works Department, US and State Geologic Surveys , State <br /> and County Health Department, County and Regional Planning, local fire <br /> departments , etc. ) <br /> SITE CHARACTERISTICS <br /> 1 Describe evidence of leakage present (e g stained soil , free product , <br /> odors, etc ) <br /> 2 Describe visible preferential patn,,ays (sand lens , root holes , etc ) in <br /> the excavation pits ,j i/yam y <br /> 3. Submit site map of surface waterbo'o es (ponds , creeks , stream, etc ) or <br /> possible subsurface conduits (seNers , septic tanks , utility lines , etc ) <br /> in the vicinity of the site <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS <br /> ( If the answer to any of the follo.vi ,-:2 _ 't,3, full explanations are required) <br /> I Fere additional samples (other than the minimum required) taken where <br /> obviously contaminated soil was present? <br /> 2 Did sampling and analytical protccols conform to standards described in <br /> LOFT and this document' <br /> 3. Were the appropriate laboratory analyses used (see Table 2)? <br /> 4 Were the laboratory analysis and QA/QC results submitted? <br /> 5 In cases of high water table, a) sere samples taken from the sidewalls <br /> and b) was water present in the excavation pit? <br /> b Were soil samples taken for every 20 lineal feet of underground piping? <br /> 7 Ue"e depth and location of soil samDles submitted? <br /> -21- <br /> 1� <br />