Laserfiche WebLink
h <br /> x $ <br /> �[ R604 :UPDATE 16 2-23-1.993 <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION <br /> II <br /> Estimates of petroleum hydrocarbons remaining in the soil after, <br /> the confirmation soil sampling that occurred on July 20, 21, 22, J <br /> 1992 was approximately 3027 pounds . Soil sample results from the <br /> SB4 confirmation sample boring and vapor samples from the vadosel <br /> zone well P1 have indicated that the former northeastern pump! <br /> island area and the surrounding area (AREA C) is now remediatedi, <br /> of the contaminant. The two remaining areas of ; impacted soilf <br /> are : AREA A - (S85) the area beneath the former; :.western pump'I k <br /> island and AREA B (SB3., SB9 and SB11) the area southeast of the <br /> former underground ''storage tanks .. <br /> Vapor extraction has removed the lighter fractions of gasoline; <br /> range hydrocarbons found in the soil and has greatly reduced they <br /> dissolved contaminant found in the ground water and the capillary[ <br /> fringe. Of the estimated 3027 pounds that remained in the soil <br /> after the July 22,1 1992 sampling, 129 out of and estimated 72 <br /> pounds have been ,; removed from AREA A and 2557 out of an'[ <br /> estimated 2946 . 5 pounds have been removed from AREA B. This <br /> leaves approximately 389 pounds of degraded gasoline ranget <br /> hydrocarbons to be removed from the soil in AREA B. If wed <br /> maintain our present vapor stream concentration, which removes; ' <br /> approximately 12 pounds per day, the majority of the estimated <br /> remaining 389 pounds will be removed from the soil by March 27,,' <br /> 1993 . Dual instrument -- GC FID and GC PID have confirmed that. <br /> benzene is no longer a component of the vapor streams . f <br /> ,F w <br /> Continual monitoring of the ground water indicates' that the once <br /> contaminated ground water associated with MW1 andEMW5 have been <br /> remediated and meet[ the Title 22 and DHS standards,. ' Ground water! I <br /> gradients, corrected for vacuum influence, 'F have shown ! <br /> potentiometric low's at the wells being used for vapor recovery i <br /> (MWS) . Once the ' vapor recovery is shut off, : normal flow <br /> directions again take place to the east-southeast' or northeast,,[ <br /> with the exception of ,the March 5, 1992 gradient, Yvhich flowed tap <br /> the north-northwest and may represent a recharge and/or a decline <br /> in water usage of the -municipal wells located east', of the site. <br /> ' Ff <br /> Fecal coliform haslbeen analyzed for monitoring wells MW3 , MW4 ,I <br /> MWS and MW6 on a monthly basis from December,: : 1991 through, <br /> February, 1992 . "!Only trace amounts of fecal coliform have been <br /> occasionally detected in any of the wells during those 3 months,, <br /> see Table 2 . <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS '! y <br /> 1 . Recommend this site for evaluation of: closure, see` <br /> Closure Evaluation Work Plan, UPDATE STATUS REPORT #15 .� <br /> 2 . Continuelivapor recovery on MW5 and the newly installed <br /> vadose wells VSB3 , VSBS, VSB9 and VSB11 .'' . <br /> 3 . Continuel'�to monitor this site on a quarterly basis . , <br /> i page 6 <br /> �I r <br />