Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 20 March 2006 <br /> AGE-NC Project No . 03- 1071 <br /> Page 9 of 13 <br /> 3 .4, EXTRACTED WATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The results of the laboratory analysis detected TPH-g in both grab samples at concentrations as high <br /> as 61 ,000 micrograms per liter (µg/1). <br /> All BTEX compounds were detected in both grab ground water samples at A concentrations as high <br /> as 9,900 gg/l benzene, 23,000 µg/1 toluene, 2,500 µg/l ethylbenzene, 18,200 xylenes, from the 09 : 15 <br /> _interval sample. <br /> Fuel oxygenated compounds MTBE, and 1 ,2-DCA were detected in the first sample M14yzed at <br /> maximum concentrations of 220 pg/1 and 230 µg/1 , respectively. The laboratory reports (CT214- <br /> 0508186) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix G. <br /> 4.0 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION (SVE) PILOT TEST <br /> On 23 August 2005, an 8-hour SVE pilot test was conducted at the site using vapor well VW-3 , <br /> screened from 15 feet bsg to 35 feet bsg as the extraction well. The pilot test was performed to <br /> provide SVE data prior to installation of a full scale remediation system. The test was conducted <br /> using a VACLEEN 1000 SVE system, manufactured by Environmental Techniques. The VACLEEN <br /> unit consists of a positive-displacement blower, driven by an internal combustion (IC) engine. <br /> Propane was used as a supplemental fuel source to start the engine and maintain performance. <br /> Hydrocarbon vapor was destroyed as part of the internal combustion process . Emissions from the <br /> engine were routed through two catalytic converters to maximize the destruction rate ofthe extracted <br /> hydrocarbon vapors. <br /> All field work procedures and reporting requirements are in accordance with guidelines issued by <br /> the Central Valley Region of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) for <br /> subsurface investigation of underground storage tank (UST) system sites. <br /> 4. 1 . SVE PILOT TEST PROCEDURES <br /> The pilot test was initiated at 0840 am and continued for approximately 7 hours, at which time the <br /> test was terminated due to stabalization. An induced vacuum potential was applied to the casing of <br /> vapor well VW-3 . The vacuum-induced pressure reduction was monitored at surrounding <br /> observation points (VW- 1 , VW-2, VW-4, and MW-2) with air-tight well caps pre-connected with <br /> Magnehelic vacuum gauges fitted to each observation well. A sample port was tapped into the PVC <br /> near the wellhead and a portable organic vapor meter equipped with a PID (PID : Microtip model <br /> 1000 calibrated to isobutylene) was used to measure organic vapor (OV) concentrations . The organic <br /> Advanced GcoEnvironmentnl, Inc. <br />