Laserfiche WebLink
20 March 2006 <br /> AGE-NC Project No . 03- 1071 <br /> Page 11 of 13 <br /> 4.4, RESULTS OF SVE PILOT TEST <br /> The SVE unit was operated at approximately 2,500 RPMs for the eight-hour test. The flow rate was <br /> measured between 30 scfm (standard cubic feet per minute) and 36 scfm for the eight-hour test. <br /> OV readings ranged from 1158 to 1401 ppm. Induced vacuum measured at the extraction well <br /> (V W-3) was a constant 94 inches of water. <br /> As expected, the greatest vacuum was measured in the observation point nearest the extraction well <br /> (VW-4). The lowest vacuum was measured in MW-2, approximately 33 feet north of the extraction <br /> point. The maximum vacuum measured at the observation points during the pilot test was plotted <br /> versus the distance from the extraction well. The effective radius of influence was determined by <br /> drawing a best-fit line though these data points to correlate distance to vacuum data. At a vacuum <br /> potential of 0. 10 inches of water, the radius of influence is approximately 28 feet; at an induced <br /> vacuum potential of 1 .0 inches of water, the radius of influence is approximately 18 .3 feet; at 10.0 <br /> inches of water the radius of influence is approximately 8 .7 feet. Based on the United States <br /> Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-prepared document, How to Evaluate Alternative Cleanup <br /> Technologies For UST sites the radius of influence is considered to be the distance from the <br /> extraction well at which a vacuum of at least 0. 1 inches of water is observed. Based upon an <br /> effective vacuum potential of 0. 1 inches of water, the calculated effective radius of influence at the <br /> site will be approximately 28 feet. Figure 5 depicts the effective radius of influence. <br /> 5.0. SUMMARY <br /> The implications from the August 2005 well installations, aquifer ground water pumping test, and <br /> SVE pilot test are as follows: <br /> • On 16 and 17 August 2005 , four vapor extraction wells (VW- 1 through VW-4) and one <br /> ground water extraction well (EW- 1 ) were installed at the site for performance of a ground <br /> water pumping test and SVE pilot test. <br /> • Generally, orange brown, dry to moist, silt, clayey silt, and silty clay was encountered <br /> between 5 and 20 feet bsg. Layers of hydrocarbon-stained poorly graded fine to medium <br /> grained sand, or silty sand, were usually encountered at various depths between 20 and 30 <br /> feet bsg. Hydrocarbon-stained sandy silt, silt, clay, or clayey silt was encountered between <br /> 25 and 35 feet bsg. Hydrocarbon-stained, saturated silty sand to sand (fine to coarse grained, <br /> poorly graded) was encountered between 35 and 55 feet bsg in pilot boring EW- I . <br /> • A total of twelve soil samples from the five pilot borings were submitted to a DHS-certified <br /> laboratory for analysis ofTPH-g, BTEX, MTBE, TAME, DIPE, ETRE, TBA, 1 ,2-DCA, and <br /> EDB. TPH-g was detected in all analyzed samples from EW- I at concentrations between <br /> I <br /> k <br /> jAdvanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br /> r <br /> f <br /> l <br />