Laserfiche WebLink
15 December 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 03-1071 <br /> Page 13 of 14 <br /> (equivalent to 70 gallons per day/ft) and a storativity value calculated at 0 .00031 (Appendix <br /> J) . <br /> • Based on transmissivity values of 10 .6 W/day (first stage) and 9 .4 ft'/day (second stage) and <br /> an aquifer thickness of 20 ft (screen interval at EW- 1 ), hydraulic conductivity values were <br /> calculated at 0 .53 ft/day, or 1 .9 x 10° cm/s (first stage) and 0.47 May, or 1 .7 x 104 cm/s <br /> (second stage) (Appendix J); these hydraulic conductivities are consistent with a screened <br /> interval located within a silty fine sand. This suggests that although the pilot boring for EW- I <br /> encountered some coarser grained sand, the fine silty sand encountered between 30 and 55 <br /> feet bsg in previous pilot borings for MW- 1 through MW-4 is more characteristic of the <br /> aquifer (see the AGE-prepared Quarterly Report - First Quarter 2004, dated 15 June 2004). <br /> • Laboratory analysis of extracted water during the pumping test detected elevated <br /> concentrations of TPH-g, BTEX, MTBE, and 1 ,2-DCA in both samples submitted for <br /> analysis. Concentrations were as high as 61 ,000 µg/1 TPH-g, 9,900 µg/I benzene, 23,000 <br /> pg/l toluene, 2,500 µg/1 ethylbenzene, 18,200 µg/1 xylenes, 220 pg/l MTBE, and 230 µg/1 <br /> 1 ,2-DCA. All concentrations detected were significantly above the respective MCLS for <br /> each contaminant. <br /> • On 23 August, a' SVE pilot test was conducted at the site. The SVE unit was operated at <br /> approximately 2,500 RPMs for the seven-hour test, with a flow rate measured between <br /> 30 scfm (standard cubic feet per minute) and 36 scfm. OV readings ranged from 1158 to <br /> 1401 ppm. Induced vacuum measured atthe extraction well (VW-3) was a constant 94 inches <br /> of water. <br /> • Based upon an effective vacuum potential of 0. 1 inches of water, the calculated effective <br /> radius of influence of SVE at the site will be approximately 28 feet (Figure 5). <br /> • TPH-g was detected in the soil gas/vapor samples at concentrations ranging from 8,700 pg/l <br /> to 10,000 µg/1. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes were detected in the <br /> gas/vapor samples at concentrations as high as 55 µg/1 benzene (In fluent 1240), 170 µg/1 <br /> toluene (In fluent 1440 and 1540), 87 µg/1 ethylbenzene (Influent 1240), and 310 µg/l total <br /> xylenes (Influent 1540). MTBE was detected at concentrations ranging between 120 µg/1 <br /> (Influent 1040) and 160 µg/1 (In fluent 1440). TPH-g, benzene, toluene, and MTBE were <br /> detected at concentrations above their respective MCLS. <br /> I <br /> 6.0. CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the ground water aquifer pumping test results, AGE concludes that groundwater extraction <br /> is not a feasible interim remediation option for removal of hydrocarbon-impacted ground water at <br /> the site. Based on the lack of# inferred radius of influence and the low transmissivity values, the site <br /> f <br /> Advanced CeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br /> f <br />