Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Geo(oglcaL`Iec(nus Inc- Page 2 <br />' Domestic Well Abandonment Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> • Apnl 23,2001 <br />' 2.2 Well Abandonment <br /> On Apnl 20, 2001, GTI staff mobilized to the site to supervise the destruction of the well by <br /> blast perforation Clark Well Inc staff was present to pump grout into the well and Water <br />' Well Technology (WWT) staff was present to conduct the blasting operation Mr Jeff <br /> Wong of the SJC PHS/EHD was on site to witness the work Photographs of the <br /> progression of the work are included in Appendix A <br />' The well destruction process was completed as follows <br /> • GTI staff measured depth to water and the total depth of the well (DTW=28 6 ft, TD= 71 <br />' ft) <br /> • WWT staff prepared the explosive charge line for insertion into the well (Photo #1) <br />' • WWT staff lowered the explosive charge line into the well (Photo #2) <br /> • Clark Well Inc staff lowered 40 feet of 2 inch PVC pipe into the well and pumped grout <br /> into the well (Photo #3) <br />' • The immediate area surrounding the well was cleared and the charge detonated <br /> • A second charge was detonated to ensure the explosives were fully depleted <br />' a The explosion vapors emanating from the well were allowed to dissipate and the grout <br /> level was checked (Photo #4) <br /> • The grout had settled approximately twelve feet down the casing The casing was <br />' . refilled with grout to the top of the casing and the operation was complete (Photo #5) <br /> 3.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> This completes the destruction of the domestic well at 60 E Castle Street, as directed by the <br /> SJC PHS/EHD With the completion of the above task, GTI concludes that the nsk of the <br /> groundwater contamination migrating vertically via the domestic well has been alleviated <br /> We recommend that the SJC PHS/EHD review and approve our August 23, 2000, "Work <br />' Plan for Vertical Definition" submitted to and received by SJC PHSIEHD on August 29, <br /> 2000 <br />' 4.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> This report was prepared in accordance with the accepted standards and practices of the <br />' field of environmental geology, groundwater hydrology and good business practices It <br /> should be recognized that definition and evaluation of environmental conditions is a <br /> difficult and inexact science Judgments leading to conclusions and recommendations are <br />' generally made with an incomplete knowledge of the site-specific conditions present <br /> The tasks proposed and completed during this project were reviewed and approved by the <br /> local regulatory agency for compliance with the law No warranty, expressed or implied, is <br /> made <br /> • <br />