My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009286
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
2315
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544690
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2019 1:14:04 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 11:56:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009286
RECORD_ID
PR0544690
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005839
FACILITY_NAME
CASTLE AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR INC.
STREET_NUMBER
2315
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12510017
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2315 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"Otogtcal rahAics Inc Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitormg Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> January 19,2004 <br />' monitoring report for the Shell site that indicates that a gasoline release has occurred from <br /> the facility at some point in time It is possible that a co-mingled plume exists beneath the <br />' site <br /> GTI recommends that interim remediation be considered before this plume migrates any <br />' further and the cost for cleanup continues to increase GTI's September 8, 2003 "Feasibility <br /> Study Work Plan - Dual Phase Soil Vapor and Groundwater Extraction Pilot Test" was <br /> approved by SJC PHS/EHD in their November 15, 2003 letter We are currently soliciting <br /> contractor bids in accordance with USTCFP requirements for the work <br /> ' 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> ' 1.1 Hydrogeology of Site <br /> A site-specific groundwater gradient and bearing were calculated from computer-generated <br /> ' contours The groundwater was flowing N71°E at a gradient of 0 0061 ft/ft The average <br /> elevation of groundwater at the site was 27 08 feet below mean sea level This represents a <br /> decrease of 0 45 feet since the September 2003 monitoring event and a cumulative decrease <br /> of 4 35 feet since March 2003 <br /> Figure 2 is a groundwater gradient map for the November 26, 2003, event. Figure 3, <br /> Groundwater Gradient Rose Diagram, includes historical groundwater directions and <br /> gradients <br /> Table 1 in Appendix A contains the groundwater elevations and gradients for the site <br /> ' Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br /> Under vertical groundwater flow conditions, the water level in a monitoring well is a <br /> function of the length of the well screen and its depth or vertical position in the aquifer As <br /> with horizontal flow conditions, the diameter of the well or piezometer is immaterial A <br /> vertical gradient was calculated for well pair MW-3/MW-201 These wells are located <br /> approximately 5 feet apart <br /> The following procedure is used to calculate vertical groundwater gradient <br /> ❑ Determine vertical distance between the two measuring devices by the distance from the <br /> ' mid-point between the top and bottom seal of the deep well (MW-201) and the mid- <br /> point between the groundwater elevation and the bottom seal in the shallow well (MW- <br /> 3) <br /> ❑ Measure the head in both wells used in the calculations <br /> ❑ If the lateral distance between the well pair is greater than a few feet, then calculations <br /> must be made to correct the down-gradient piezometric head to account for the sloping <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.