My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009287
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
2315
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0544690
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2019 1:18:02 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 11:57:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009287
RECORD_ID
PR0544690
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005839
FACILITY_NAME
CASTLE AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR INC.
STREET_NUMBER
2315
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
12510017
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2315 N EL DORADO ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' (�ealo tcal Technics Inc <br /> � Page 2 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 723 2 <br /> November 13,2003 <br /> GTI recommends that interim remediation be considered before this plume migrates any <br /> further and the cost for cleanup continues to increase We submitted our September 8, 2003 <br /> ' "Feasibility Study Work Plan - Dual Phase Soil Vapor and Groundwater Extraction Pilot <br /> Test" to evaluate a remedial alteinative that could be economically used on this site We <br /> have not yet received a response from the San Joaquin County PHS/EHD <br /> 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 H dro eolo of Site <br /> Y g gJ' <br /> A site-specific groundwater gradient and bearing were calculated from computer-generated <br /> contours The groundwater was flowing N60°E at a gradient of 0 0058 ft/ft The average <br /> elevation of groundwater at the site was 26 63 feet below mean sea level This represents a <br /> decrease of 3 82 feet since the June 2003 monitoring event <br /> ' Figure 2 is a groundwater gradient map for the September 12, 2003, event Figure 3, <br /> Groundwater Gradient Rose Diagram, includes historical groundwater directions and <br /> gradients <br /> Table 1 in Appendix A contains the groundwater elevations and gradients for the site <br /> ' Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br /> Under vertical groundwater flow conditions, the water level in a monitoring well is a <br /> function of the length of the well screen and its depth or vertical position in the aquifer As <br /> with horizontal flow conditions, the diameter of the well or piezometer is immaterial A <br /> vertical gradient was calculated for well pair MW-3/MW-201 These wells are located <br /> approximately 5 feet apart <br /> The following procedure is used to calculate vertical groundwater gradient <br /> ' • Determine vertical distance between the two measuring devices by the distance from the <br /> mid-point between the top and bottom seal of the deep well (MW-201) and the mid- <br /> point between the groundwater elevation and the bottom seal in the shallow well (MW- <br /> 3) <br /> • Measure the head in both wells used in the calculations <br /> • If the lateral distance between the well pair is greater than a few feet, then calculations <br />' must be made to correct the down-gradient piezometric head to account for the sloping <br /> water table between the wells The calculation considers the slope of the water table and <br />' the distance in a down-gradient direction between the two wells used in the calculations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.