My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009181
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EL DORADO
>
2450
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544695
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0009181
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2019 2:38:01 PM
Creation date
7/24/2019 2:35:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009181
RECORD_ID
PR0544695
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0014243
FACILITY_NAME
UNDEVELOPED PARCEL
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
EL DORADO
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16707028
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2450 S EL DORADO
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 30 April 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 04-1129 <br />' Page 3 of 5 <br />' 3 4 2 Collection and Analysis of Ground Water Samples <br /> After allowing the wells to achieve a minimum 80% recovery of the pre-purge volume, water <br />' samples were collected from monitoring wells MW-1,MW-2, and MW-3 using the Watera internal <br /> pump The samples were transferred into laboratory-supplied 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic <br /> analysis(VOA)vials containing 0 5 ml 18%hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and into one <br />' 1711ter amber bottle without a sample preservative The sample containers were then labeled with <br /> well designation,date,time of sampling and the sampler's initials The samples were transported in <br /> a chilled container under chain-of-custody to CTEL, a California Department of Health Services <br />' (DHS)-certified laboratory, for analysis The samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g), TPH-d and total petroleum <br />' hydrocarbons quantified as motor oil (TPH-mo) in accordance with EPA Method 8015 <br /> Modified, <br />' BTEX in accordance with EPA Method 8260B, and <br /> Fuel additives including methyl tertiary-butyl ether, di-isopropyl ether, ethyl tertiary-butyl <br /> lie <br /> ether, tertiary-amyl methyl ether, tertiary-butyl alcohol, 1,2-dibromo ethane and 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane in accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br />' 4.0. FINDINGS <br />' Boring log soil descriptions were utilized to model the subsurface soil profile at the site The impact <br /> to soil and ground water was assessed from laboratory analytical data obtained from samples <br />' collected during the well installation and subsequent sampling Ground water elevation, flow <br /> direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected on 12 May 2003 <br />' 41 STRATIGRAPHY T <br />' Generally, moderate to moderate yellowish brown to bluish gray, dry to moist, silt, silty clay and <br /> lean clay were encountered from at 25 feet bsg and from 35 feet bsg to'total depth in soil boring PB- <br /> 20 Moderate yellowish brown,dry,poorly graded sand was encountered at 30 feet The boring log <br />' generated from data collected during the May 2003 site assessment is included in Appendix B <br /> I42 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> A total of two soil samples were analyzed as described in Section 3 3 Analytes of concern were not <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironmentai,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.