Laserfiche WebLink
30 April 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 04-1129 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />' detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the two soil samples <br /> Analytical results of soil samples are summarized on Table 1 The laboratory reports (CTEL <br /> Laboratory Ids 0305-062-1 and 0305-062-2), quality assurance and quality control(QA/QC)report <br /> and chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix D <br /> I4 3 GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br />' Depth to ground water was measured at between 33 48 feet and 34 37 feet bsg in wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-3 Relative ground water elevations at the site ranged from 32 85 feet below MSL in <br /> well MW-2 to 34 37 feet below MSL in well MW-3 (Table 2) Ground water flow direction was <br />' inferred to be toward the southeast at a gradient of approximately 0 01 ft/ft Figure 3 depicts the <br /> contours for February 2003 <br /> I4 4 ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> • None of the target analytes were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the samples <br /> collected from the three ground water monitoring wells <br /> Analytical results for the ground water samples for the May 2003 monitoring event are summarized <br /> on Table 3 The laboratory report(CTLE Laboratory IDs 0305-061-1 through 0305-061-3), QA/QC <br /> Iand chain-of-custody are included in Appendix E <br />' 5.0. SUMMARY AND,CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the findings from this investigation, AGE concludes <br /> • Analytes of concern were not detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in soil samples <br /> collected from probe boring PB-20 <br /> IOn 12 May 2003, the ground water at the site was inferred to be flowing generally toward <br /> the southeast at an average gradient of 0 01 feet/feet <br /> • Target analytes were not detected in the ground water samples collected from the three <br /> monitoring wells on 12 May 2003 <br /> • <br />' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />