COMPLIANCE INFO 2004 - 2011 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Jun 11 04 12:5Ga Mike Dotten (209) 533-2650 p.2 D. Results of Testing/Servicing Software Version Installed: Software? What software? Comnlete the follnwinn cherklictr ❑ Yes ® No* Is the audible alarm operational? ❑ Yes ® No* Is the visual alarm operational? ❑ Yes ❑ No* Is the Print function rational? ® Not installed. ❑ Yes ® No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? ❑ Yes ® No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their proper operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) ® N/A operational? ❑ Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment ® N/A monitoring system detects a Ieak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ❑ Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑ No. ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no ® N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? ❑ Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. ® Yes* ❑ No Was liquid found inside any secondary containmentstems designed as sy gn dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ Product; ® Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. ® Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring stem set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up Eports, if applicable ❑ Yes ® No* Is all monitoring ui mento erational per manufacturer'sspecifications? X in Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected, E. Comments: The Veeder-Root was basically inoperable. The display cycled between all the sensors indicating that they were unreliable and nothing changed when the sensors were put into alarm. Sensor #S was raised about 1" but that was because of the length of the wire and the way it was looped over the piping. There was no liquid in the sump that would indicate that it was done to avoid an alarm condition, and the sensor did not work anyway. There was no liquid in the dispenser pans but there was about a foot of water (probably from the sprinkler system on the lawn) in the Gasoline piping sump and the annular probes were nowhere near the bottom of the annular space. When the operator of the facility learned of the conition of the monitoring system they voluntarily shut down the fueling operation and called Elite IV to do the repairs. Page 2 of 3 03101