Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 12 April 2006 , <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0301 " <br /> Page 3 of 7 <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline,diesel,kerosene,and motor oil(TPH-g, <br /> ' TPH-d, TPH-k, and TPH-mo, respectively) by EPA Method 8015M; and <br /> • Benzene,toluene, ethylbenzene,and xylenes (BTEX), methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE), <br /> 1,2-Dichloroethane(1,2-DCA),ethylene dibromide(EBD),di-isopropyl ether(DIPE),ethyl <br /> tert-butyl ether(ETBE),tert-amyl methyl ether(TAME),and tertiary butanol(TBA)by EPA <br /> Method 8260B. <br /> ' 3.0. FINDINGS . <br /> Groundwater elevation,flow direction,and gradient were determined from field data collected on 20 <br /> ' December 2005. The contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water <br /> samples collected on 20 December 2005. <br /> ' 3.1. GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> ' • The depth to ground water measurements at wells MW-1,MW-2 and MW-4 through MW-12 varied <br /> between 33.85 feet(MW-9A)"and 35.53 feet(MW-8C)below the tops of the well casings; ground <br /> water elevations were calculated to be between 21.63 feet (MW-8A�and 22.66 feet (MW-11C) <br /> ' below mean sea level(MSL). The average ground water elevation at the site on 20 December 2005 <br /> was 22.17 feet below MSL. Generally, ground water elevation at the site decreased an average <br /> 0.23 feet between' the,,!� 2005 and the S i er 2005 ground water monitoring events.Sa�$irs� <br /> Ground water elevation data collected on 20 December 2005 from wells MW-8(A-C),MW-9(A-D), <br /> ' and MW-12 (A-D) is depicted on cross section D-D' (Figure 3). By determining the difference <br /> between ground water elevations(dh)and dividing by the difference of the screen interval midpoints <br /> (dl), the vertical gradient between adjacent screen intervals was calculated. Generally, moderately <br /> steep to steep downward vertical gradients were observed between the Second, Third, and Fourth <br /> ' Water Zones; while upward to very low downward vertical gradients were observed between the <br /> First Water Zone and the Second Water Zone in the northern and southern portions of the site, <br /> respectively (Figure 3). <br /> The ground water elevations at wells MW-1,MW-4 and MW-6 through MW-12 were calculated by <br /> ' subtracting the measured depth to ground water from the surveySd casing elevation. The December <br /> 2005 ground water elevation data collected from wells MW-1, W-4, -M"W-6 and MW-7 were <br /> plotted for the First Water Zone (Figure 4) as defined in AGE's CPT Site Investigation - Third <br /> ' Quarter 2001 (dated 25 October 2001). Generally,the net ground water flow direction was toward <br /> the northeast at an approximate hydraulic gradient of 0.004 foot/foot(ft/ft).The local ground water <br /> ' Advanced GcoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />