Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> 18 November 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0301 <br /> ' Page 2 of 6 <br /> 2 1 WELL MONITORING AND PURGING <br /> ' . Soo a I rigs a r,-M-mac (,I Va 101 APP" <br /> On 17 June 2004, depth to ground water was measured in each well from the top of the well casing <br /> to the nearest 0 01-foot utilizing a Solinst water level meter It was noted that the probe would not <br /> pass below 37 feet in well MW-9A <br /> On 18 June 2004, single-completion monitoring wells MWA through MW-7 and multi-level <br /> monitoring wells MW-8 through MW-12 were purged by lowering and raising a 3/8-inch outer <br /> diameter, length-discrete polyethylene hose equipped with a ball-valve water tip through the top <br /> ' chambers into the specific water-charged screened section A Waterra Hydro-Lift II pump equipped <br /> with a mechanical arm was utilized to surge each well with $/a-inch diameter polyethylene hose <br /> Approximately 3 to 27 gallons of ground water(a minimum of three casing-water volumes per well) <br /> were purged from single-completion wells MW-1 through MW-7 and approximately%2 to 3 gallons <br /> were purged from multi-level wells MW-8 through MW-12 Temperature,pH,and conductivity were <br /> measured for stabilization at regular purge-volume intervals from each well using an Oakton water <br /> analyzer Field data and logs are included in Appendix A All purged ground water was transferred <br /> to Department of Transportation (DOT)-approved model 17H 55-gallon drums and stored on-site <br /> in an area lacking general public access <br /> 1 � I <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> After each well was purged, ground water levels were re-measured to verify the amount of ground <br /> I <br /> water recharge Upon achieving at least 80% ground water recharge, samples were collected from <br /> ' wells MW-1 through MW-12 utilizing the techniques described above in purging each well Ground <br /> water samples from each well were transferred into three 40-milliliter(ml) EPA-approved volatile <br /> ' organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid solution as a sample <br /> preservative and one 1-liter amber bottle without sample preservative Care was taken to ensure that <br /> visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after filling and capping Ground water sample <br /> ' containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's initials <br /> 2 3 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Following collection and labeling,each ground water sample was logged on a chain of custody form, <br /> ' placed in a chilled container, and transported to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a <br /> California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory, for analysis for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline,diesel,kerosene,and motor oil(TPH-g, <br /> . TPH-d, TPH-k, and TPH-mo, respectively) by EPA Method 8015M, and <br /> ' ' Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />