Laserfiche WebLink
07 December 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0301 <br /> Page 3 of 4 , <br /> events, decreasing ground water elevation has been observed at the site since the December 1999 <br /> ' ground water monitoring event The ground water elevation data for MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and <br /> MW-4 during the September 2000 ground water monitoring event is depicted in Figure 3 Ground <br /> water flow direction for the area bound by wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4 was generally <br /> ' toward the north-northeast at a gradient of 0 001 ft/fl, or approximately 5 feet per mile (Figure 3) <br /> ' 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF MONITORING WELL GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> ' A total of four ground water samples were submitted to a DHS-certified laboratory in September <br /> 2000 TPH-g was detected in water samples collected from wells MW-1 and MW-4 at concentrations <br /> of 38,000 and 63 micrograms per liter(/,cg/1), respectively, TPH-d was detected in the water sample <br /> ' collected from MW-1 at a concentration of 4,500µg11 <br /> BTEX compounds were detected in the ground water samples collected from wells MW-1 and MW- <br /> ' 4 at concentrations ranging as high as 5,200 4gll (MW-1, xylenes) Benzene was detected in the <br /> water sample collected from well MW-1 at a concentration of 2,100 µg/1 <br /> Fuel oxygenated compounds were not detected above the respected laboratory reporting limits <br /> Analytical results of the ground water samples are summarized in Table 2 The laboratory reports <br /> (Castle Analytical Laboratories Reference No 3217 and McCampbell Analytical Inc I D No 47851 <br /> ' through 47854) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br /> ' 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> ' The implications from the September 2000 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> • Ground water flow direction at the site appeared to be oriented generally towards the north- <br /> northeast at a gradient of 0 001, due to the low gradient at the site, slight variations in ground <br /> water measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly <br /> modify ground water flow direction <br /> ' • The ground water elevation at the site was within the screened intervals of wells MW-1, <br /> MW-2,MW-3 and MW-4,which yield samples fully representative of shallow ground water <br /> 1conditions <br /> • Ground water elevations decreased at the site an average 3 30 feet between the June 2000 and <br /> September 2000 ground water monitoring events, the decrease of ground water elevations <br /> ' Is probably due to the seasonal fluctuation pattern <br /> • The core of the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plume appears to be located in the area of <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> i <br />