Laserfiche WebLink
' 31 May 2000 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 97-0301 <br /> ' Page 3 of 4 <br /> I <br /> ' 2000 ground water monitoring event is depicted in Figure 3 Ground water flow direction for the area <br /> bound by wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4 was generally toward the north-northwest at a <br /> gradient of 0 002 ft/fl, or approximately 11 feet per mile (Figure 3) <br /> 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF MONITORING WELL GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> 1I <br /> A total of four ground water samples were submitted to a DHS-certified laboratory in March 2000 <br /> TPH-g was detected in water samples collected from wells MW-1 and MW-2 at concentrations of <br /> ' 27,000 nucrograms per liter(µg11) and 86µg11, respectivley, TPH-d was detected in water samples <br /> collected from wells MW-1,MW-3 and MW-4 at concentrations ranging up to 2,900 gg/l,however, <br /> the laboratory reported that the diesel chromatograms from MW-1 lacked typical diesel <br /> characteristics <br /> BTEX compounds were detected in the ground water samples collected from well MW-1 at <br /> concentrations ranging as high as 3,600 go Benzene was detected in the water samples collected <br /> from wells MW-1 and MW-4 at concentrations of 1,600µg11 and 2 4 gg/l, respectively <br /> ,• <br /> MTBE was detected in the ground water sample collected from well MW-2 at a concentration of <br /> 0 51 gg/l TBA was detected for the first time in a ground water sample collected from MW-1 at a <br /> ' concentration of 81 gg/1 No other fuel oxygenates were detected in any other analyzed ground water <br /> samples above the respected laboratory reporting limits <br /> ' Analytical results of the ground water samples are summarized in Table 2 The laboratory reports <br /> (Castle Analytical Laboratories Reference No 2894 and McCampbell Analytical Inc I D No 33126 <br /> through 33129) and chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix B <br /> 1 <br /> ' 4.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The implications from the March 2000 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> ' Ground water flow direction at the site appeared to be oriented generally towards the north- <br /> northwest at a gradient of 0 002, due to the low gradient at the site, slight variations in <br /> ' ground water measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could <br /> greatly modify ground water flow direction <br /> The ground water elevation at the site was approximately four to five feet above the screen <br />� intervals at wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-4 <br /> • • Ground water elevations increased at the site an average 4 27 feet from December 1999 to <br /> I , <br /> Advanced GeoEn\ironmental,Inc <br />