Laserfiche WebLink
1 Bank of Stockton - Cutter Lumber Site Page 3 <br /> Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No. 102.2 <br /> . February 6,2004 <br /> i ' 2.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> The following sub-sections describe the procedures associated with the <br /> tcompletion of groundwater monitoring at the site along with documenting the <br /> disposal of the well purge water associated with groundwater monitoring <br /> activity. <br /> 2.1 Groundwater Sample Collection <br /> ' On December 12, 2003, Del-Tech Geotechnical Services of Oakdale, CA <br /> mobilized to the site to complete groundwater monitoring. The groundwater <br /> monitoring procedure was as follows: Upon arrival, each well was opened and <br /> the water level allowed to equilibrate. As each well was opened, and prior to <br /> taking the depth to groundwater measurement, a PID organic vapor meter was <br /> used to screen for VOC's in the head space of the well. The depth to <br /> ' groundwater was then measured by lowering an electronically actuated air 1 <br /> water interface detector suspended from a polyethylene measuring tape <br /> calibrated to the nearest 0-01 foot (see groundwater monitoring data sheets in <br /> Appendix B). A careful notation made of the depth to groundwater as measured <br /> by the device. No measurable free product was observed in the wells. <br /> Each well was pumped with a Wattera pump and dedicated vinyl tubing lowered <br /> ' to bottom. Well water was containerized in PP <br /> 55-gallon DOT approved <br /> g <br /> polyethylene drums, properly labeled, and temporarily stored on-site. The rate <br /> 1 1 of well purging was monitored, and each well was purged of at least three casing j <br /> volumes or until the groundwater parameters (temperature, conductivity, and <br /> ' pH) had stabilized indicating that water representative of actual aquifer <br /> conditions was entering the well. Groundwater parameter stabilization was <br /> characterized by three successive readings within 10 percent. After the wells had <br /> been allowed to recharge to at least 80 percent of their original volume, samples <br /> were collected from them using methods described below. <br /> After purging was completed, the Wattera pump was used to produce a water <br /> sample directly into the sample containers. Before and in between uses, all <br /> sampling equipment was washed using a portable steam cleaner. Disposable <br /> ' gloves were worn by the sampling technician while collecting all samples. The <br /> gloves were changed between the collection of each sample to reduce the <br /> potential for cross-contamination. <br /> ' Extreme care was exercised while collecting samples to prevent agitation of the <br /> water while filling the sample containers. Water samples were transferred from <br /> the bailer into 40 ml VOA vials preserved with hydrochloric acid (provided by <br /> . the analytical laboratory). All samples were checked for head space bubbles, <br /> 2937 Veneman Ave.,#5240 Geo-Phase Environmental Inc. Phone 209 569-0293 <br /> Modesto, CA 95356 Fax(209) 569-0293 <br /> I 1 <br />