Laserfiche WebLink
N <br /> I AZURE ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> • November 1998 The ground-water level at MW-2 decreased approximately 0 5 feet during the <br /> quarterly period from September 1998 to November 1998 <br /> Water table elevation data collected at the Site indicate the general direction of ground-water flow <br /> is toward the northeast, with local variations of flow direction in the area adjacent to the former <br /> tank locations at the Site(Figure 3) These data are generally consistent with potentiometric data <br /> and interpretations of ground-water flow direction at the Site presented in previous investigation <br /> reports Shallow ground water in the site vicinity flows toward the northeast under a hydraulic <br /> gradient of approximately 0 001 ft/ft <br /> 3_2 Ground-Water Sampling and Laboratory Analysis <br />' On November 23, 1998, ground-water samples were collected from nine monitoring wells at the <br /> Site (Table 1) The samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) <br /> and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene(BTEX) compounds Historical laboratory <br /> analysis results are summarized in Table 3, laboratory certificates are included in Appendix A and <br /> field sampling data sheets are included in Appendix B Most recent ground-water monitoring data <br /> of benzene concentrations m ground water are illustrated in Figure 4 <br />' Petroleum hydrocarbon data from wells sampled for the fourth quarter 1998 monitoring event are <br /> liegenerally consistent to previous results for wells at the perimeter of the ground-water plume, <br /> while concentrations are generally lower at wells near the former UST locations compared with <br /> data from the previous sampling events The highest concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons in <br /> ground water are detected at monitonng wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-6 which are <br />' located adjacent to the area of the former UST locations at the Site (Figure 4) Second quarter <br /> ,monitoring data for well MW-6 indicate concentrations of TPHg(18,000 ppb) and benzene <br /> I (2,400 ppb) These data indicate a decrease in petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations at well <br /> MW-6 compared to data collected dunng the previous sampling event (Table 3) The histoncal <br /> range of petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations detected at well MW-6 vanes from 120,000 ppb <br /> (October 1994) to 15,000 ppb (November 1996) of TPHg, and 25,000 ppb (May 1998) to 2,200 <br /> ppb (October 1995) of benzene <br /> Benzene concentrations at near source wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 ranged between 2 1,000 <br /> ppb (MW-1) and 1,800 ppb (MW-2) These data indicate similar benzene concentrations at each <br /> well compared to data collected during the previous sampling event (Table 3) A decrease of <br /> benzene concentrations was detected m well MW-5 m November 1998 (400 ppb) compared to <br /> the previous sampling result (2,000 ppb) Fluctuations in concentrations of benzene and other <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons in the near-source wells are likely the result of changes in ground-water <br />' levels, dissolution of hydrocarbons from capillary zone soils, and the effects of natural attenuation <br /> mechanisms <br /> The downgradient extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in ground water is monitored at penmeter <br /> wells MW-7 through MW-10 Monitoring data collected for perimeter wells in November 1998 <br /> indicate BTEX was not detected and TPHg was detected at a trace concentration (50 ppb) only in <br /> I <br />' 2 <br />