Laserfiche WebLink
Former Manna Pro Site Pae 8 <br /> Project No 207 3 <br />' Remedial Feasibility Study <br /> 5.0 VAPOR EXTRACTION WITH AIR SPARGING <br /> As discussed above, in recent years groundwater at the site has been recorded at historically <br />' high levels The surface of groundwater has recently been as high as 25 feet bgs, but as late <br /> as 1994, the groundwater surface was as low as 40 feet bgs This rise in groundwater <br /> elevation was coeval with six continuous years of greater-than-average rainfall in the <br /> northern San Joaquin Valley The highest concentrations of gasoline are known to lie from <br /> about 35 to 45 bgs or about 10 to 25 below the surface of groundwater Due to the fact that <br /> the bulk of the contaminant mass lies 10 to 20 feet below the groundwater surface, we <br />' postulated that remedial measures based solely on vapor extraction would not be sufficient to <br /> materially reduce the contaminant mass below groundwater in a reasonable period of time <br /> (see Section 3 0) Air sparging is a process in which air is infected into the saturated <br /> subsurface This, in-turn, introduces oxygen, thus helping to facilitate the growth of aerobic <br /> bacteria, and it also mobilizes contaminants bringing them to the groundwater surface thus <br />' enhancing the effectiveness of vapor extraction As these mobilized hydrocarbons moved <br /> through, and up, the water column, down-gradient vapor extraction wells could be used to <br /> extract these newly mobilized petroleum hydrocarbons <br />' Based on results of the pilot test, air sparging was effective in introducing oxygen into the <br /> subsurface and the PID field data suggested that it enhanced the effectiveness of vapor <br /> extraction by a factor of about two Moreover, the dramatic increase of dissolved oxygen in <br /> nearby observation wells demonstrates that the sparging was also effective in raising the <br /> oxygen levels in a semi-confined sand in which much of the contamination is contained <br />' The air sample analytical results from samples collected before and after the initiation of air <br /> sparging are inconclusive in supporting the supposition that air sparging increased the <br />' hydrocarbon concentration of influent air extracted from VEW-1 This is attributed to the <br /> relatively brief time the sparge system was in operation Nevertheless, field measurements <br />' showed that contaminant concentrations in evolved air increased markedly as a result of air <br /> sparging Prior to commencement of air sparging but after the vapor extraction system was <br /> activated, PID measurements of the extracted vapor from extraction well VEW-1 yielded <br />' readings which ranged between 52 and 33 ppm (from 05122100) During the operation of the <br /> air sparging system (from 05/30/00-06101/00), the PID readings from VEW-1 displayed a <br /> generally increasing trend from 52 to 109 ppm on 05130 to 109 to 120 ppm on 05/31 and 147 <br /> to 290 ppm on 06/01 <br /> As documented in the July 31 pilot test report, the increase in oxygen concentration was <br /> plotted against the respective distance each well from the sparge point The data points were <br /> plotted on a log-normal scatter chart A linear regression, best-fit curve was calculated in the <br /> Excel software and the radius of influence from sparging was taken as the intersect of the <br /> trend line with the 0 point of the oxygen increase Using this method, the radius of influence <br /> of the dissolved oxygen from the sparge well was estimated to be about 24 feet <br /> 2937 Veneman Ave , #8240 Geo-Phase Environmental Inc Phone(209)569-0293 <br /> Modesto, CA 95356 Fax(209)569-0295 <br />