Laserfiche WebLink
' Pae 4 <br /> Report- Pilot Remedial System Test g <br /> Former Manna Pro Site <br /> Project No 207 3 <br /> July 31,2000 <br /> wcoeval with six continuous years of greater-than-average rainfall in the northern San <br /> Joaquin Valley The highest concentrations of gasoline are known to lie from about 35 to <br />' 45 bgs or about 10 to 25 below the surface of groundwater Due to the fact that the bulk <br /> of the contaminant plume lies 10 to 25 feet below the groundwater surface, we postulated <br /> that remedial measures based principally on vapor extraction would not be sufficient to <br /> materially reduce the contaminant mass below groundwater in a reasonable period of <br /> time Air sparging to introduce oxygen into the saturated subsurface and mobilize <br /> contaminants to the groundwater surface was posited as an attractive supplement to <br /> enhance the effectiveness of vapor extraction It was anticipated that infected air would <br /> encourage the growth of aerobic bacteria and would also mobilize light hydrocarbons and <br /> cause them to rise to the groundwater surface As these mobilized hydrocarbons moved <br />' through, and up, the water column, down-gradient vapor extraction wells could be used to <br /> extract them One drawback of this remedial method is that the vapor extraction and the <br /> air sparging would both tend to generate a local rise in the level of groundwater causing a <br />' localized groundwater "mound" It was feared that hydrocarbons would tend to migrate <br /> "down-hill" radially away from this localized groundwater mound We suggested that an <br /> effective way to capture and destroy such fugitive hydrocarbons would be to contain the <br />' plume with a passive oxygen barrier This barrier could be constructed by placing <br /> magnesium dioxide in soil borings down-gradient the groundwater plume This material <br /> lie is available under the trade name, Oxygen Releasing Compound (ORC) <br /> 1.2.2 Scope of Work <br /> In order to complete the pilot study of the conceptual model outlined above, the following <br /> steps were completed <br />' • A 15 inch diameter boring was drilled to 50 feet below ground surface A 4 inch <br /> diameter by 50 foot deep vapor extraction well was later constructed in this boring <br /> • A 2 inch by 55 foot air sparge well was constructed approximately 15 feet up-gradient <br />' from the vapor extraction well. The boring was constructed in such a way that <br /> ambient air could be injected into the subsurface at a depth somewhat below the main <br /> contaminant mass By doing this, mobilized contaminants would move through the <br /> subsurface to the vapor extraction well <br /> • In order to adequately monitor the subsurface response to the vapor extraction / air <br /> sparge pilot testing, two air monitoring wells were constructed These are 2 inch <br />' diameter wells constructed in 10 inch diameter borings drilled to 30 feet below the <br /> ground surface <br /> • Selected soil samples from each of the borings were submitted to test for the presence <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons In addition, several samples (including several from the <br /> recently constructed monitonng well MW-11) were submitted for analysis of certain <br /> geo-technical soil parameters and bactena counts This was completed in anticipation <br /> of future risk assessment and fate and transport modeling <br /> 2937 Veneman Ave,#8240 Geo-Phase Environmental Inc Phone(209)569-0293 <br /> Modesto,CA 95356 Fax(209) 569-0295 <br />