Laserfiche WebLink
f; 4 May 1995 <br /> AGE-NC-95-0118 <br /> - - Page 2 of 4 <br /> site. <br /> Ii <br /> On 30 August 1994, three additional borings were drilled at the site to_depths.of 49 feet and <br /> completed as 2-inch ground water monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3. A total of 13 <br /> soil samples were analyzed for TPH as gasoline and BTE&X. <br /> Hydrocarbon odors were noted in soil samples from B-1, MW-2 and MW-3. No organic <br /> `j vapors were detected in MW-1. Laboratory analyses detected TPH as gasoliane in 6 of the <br /> 13 samples analyzed. TPH as gasoline and BTE&X were detected in all four soil samples <br /> ration of gasoline was detected in B-1 at a depth of 30 feet <br /> from B-1. The highest concent <br /> at 3,200 pprii. <br /> TPH as gasoline and BTE&X were detected in two samples from MW-3; toluene was <br /> =� detected in one sample from MW-2; and xylenes were detected in three samples from M%��- <br /> 2. No petroleum hydrocarbons,,\,ere detected in samples from MW-1,The analytical results <br /> are summarized iii Table 1. <br /> 2.4. GROUND WATER MONITORING <br /> On 2 September 1994, the ground water deptlis in all wells were measured relative to the <br /> top of the casing using a Solinst water level meter (Table 2). The groundwater gradient was <br /> calculated to be 0.0029 ft/ft diaected S 76° E. <br /> -3 <br /> .� Results of the initial gr-oundwater samples indicated that TPH as gasoline was detected in <br /> MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations of 280 ppb, 9,,500 ppb and 1,200 ppb, <br /> respectively. BTE&-X were detected in samples from MW-2 and MW-3 at concentrations <br /> up to 1,600 ppb (toluene, MW-2). No BTE&,X were detected in MW-1. The analytical <br /> results of all groundwater samples are summarized in Table 3. <br /> 3.0. PROCEDURES <br /> is <br /> 3.1. MONITORING WELL PURGE PROCEDURES <br /> On 16 March 1995, the water level in each well was measured relative to the top of the <br /> casing using a Solinst water level meter (Table 2). After water levels were measured, <br /> -- approximately 6 gallons of water (a nninimum of three well volumes) were evacuated frond <br /> each well using a PVC bailer. Temperature, pH and conductivity were pleasured at oare- <br /> 1 gallon intervals using ail ICM model 52200 water analyzer. Stabilization data and field logs <br /> are included in Appendix A. The purge water was stored on-site in 55-gallon drums. <br />