My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010943
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ENTERPRISE
>
355
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544728
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS XR0010943
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2019 5:06:20 PM
Creation date
8/1/2019 4:43:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010943
RECORD_ID
PR0544728
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003802
FACILITY_NAME
ACCURATE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
STREET_NUMBER
355
STREET_NAME
ENTERPRISE
STREET_TYPE
PL
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
21221008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
355 ENTERPRISE PL
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 03 June 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 97-0360 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> 3.2. GROUND WATER GRADIENT.AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> At the time of the February 2002 sampling event, depths to ground water in wells MW 1 through <br /> MW5 and EW1 ranged from 6.65 feet to 8.61 feet below the well heads. Ground water elevations <br /> r at the site ranged from 3.79 feet above mean sea level(MSL)in well MW2 to 4.44 feet above MSL <br /> in well EW 1 (Table 1). <br /> The ground water flow direction was inferred using ground water elevation data from the monitoring <br /> wells on-site. Well MW2 was not used in ground water flow direction or gradient determination <br /> =� because it is screened at a deeper interval than the other wells. The flow direction was inferred to be <br /> toward the west-southwest at a gradient of 0.003 feetifeet.Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground <br /> water elevations as measured on 11 February 2002. <br /> 3.3. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> A total of 11 soil samples were analyzed for TPH-g,TPH-d,BTEX,MTBE and seven fuel additives. <br /> j TPH-g was detected in the soil samples collected frozxl MW1, MW3, MW4, MW5 and EW1 at <br /> 10 feet bs at concentrations as hi as 160 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). TPH-d was detected <br /> g � � p �' ( fig) <br /> in the same samples,with the exception of EW I,at concentrations as high as 3,800 mg/kg.No other <br /> analytes were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the soil samples analyzed. The <br /> approximate extent of impacted soil is depicted on Figures 4 and 5. <br /> jAnalytical results of soil samples are summarized on Table 2.The laboratory reports(CTEL Lab I.D. <br /> Nos. 0202-002-1 through 0202-002-11), quality assurance and quality control(QA/QC)report and <br /> chain-of-custody forms are included in Appendix E. <br /> ';- 3.4. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> TPH-g was detected in the ground water samples collected from all the wells sampled, with the <br /> exception of MW3 at concentrations as high as 380 micrograms per liter(µg/l). No other analytes <br /> - were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits in the ground water samples. <br /> The analytical results of ground water samples are summarized on Table 3. The laboratory reports <br /> (CTEL Lab I.D.Nos. 0202-050-1 through 0202-050-6), QA/QC report and chain-of-custody form <br /> are included in Appendix F. <br /> --rte <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br /> L= <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.