My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LATHROP
>
1250
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0521881
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2019 1:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/5/2019 10:50:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0521881
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014865
FACILITY_NAME
CALIFORNIA NATURAL PRODUCTS
STREET_NUMBER
1250
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LATHROP
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19804001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1250 E LATHROP RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
811
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.� Californiafgional Water Qualiymontrol Board <br /> Central Valley Region : <br /> Robert Schneider,Chair <br /> Alan C.Lloyd Ph.D. Arnold Schwarzenegger <br /> Secretaryfor Sacramento Main Office Governor <br /> Environmental Protection Internet Address: http:/Aw .swrcb.ca.gov/—mgcb5 <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive,#200,Rancho Cord }ilk} n D <br /> Phone(916)464-3291•FAX(916 Illi 1V// <br /> JAN 2 0 7005 18 January 2005 <br /> Lynn Forcum ENVIRONMENT HEALTH <br /> California Natural Products PERMIT/SERMOES <br /> P.O. Box 1219 <br /> Lathrop, CA 95330 <br /> REQUEST FOR A REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE, CALIFORNL4 NATURAL PRODUCTS, <br /> LATHROP,SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed your 3 December 2004 correspondence that notifies the Regional Board of California <br /> Natural Products' plan to change the land application area configuration. The proposed change will add <br /> 7.5-acres to the 10.1-acre land application area and remove 5.5-acres from the 9.2-acre landscape <br /> application area. The changes will result in a net increase of land application area of approximately <br /> 2-acres. The proposed change requires submittal of a Report of Waste Discharge (RWD). California <br /> Water Code Section 13260(c)requires: <br /> Every person subject to subdivision (a) shall file with the appropriate regional board a report <br /> of waste discharge relative to any material change or proposed change in the character, <br /> location, or volume of the discharge. <br /> Submittal of an RWD is required prior to changing the wastewater application areas. You may submit it <br /> at your convenience but please allow at least 150 days for staff to process the application. Because <br /> California Natural Products' WDRs were updated relatively recently (5 September 2003), an abbreviated <br /> RWD will likely be acceptable. <br /> An RWD consists of the Form 200 ApplicationlReport of Waste Discharge General Information <br /> (enclosed), a filing fee (already paid through the annual fee program), and the answers to the Additional <br /> Questions. A California Registered Engineer shall prepare the technical report. The RWD, at a <br /> minimum, shall address the Additional Questions; it shall also include any additional information <br /> required to explain the site-specific processes. Background groundwater quality at the 10.1-acre land <br /> application area has not been adequately defined; therefore, a groundwater investigation shall be <br /> performed to define background groundwater quality at the 10.1-acre land application area. Definition <br /> of background groundwater quality has been an issue at the land application area since WDRs Order No. <br /> R5-2003-0141 was adopted. Submittals intended to address the issue have been incomplete and have <br /> not adequately addressed the issue. A 15 July 2004 Hydrogeologic Evaluation Review correspondence <br /> prepared by the Regional Board raised a number of issues that remain. The issues are: <br /> • Staff does not agree with the report's conclusion that Well W-5 is an appropriate upgradient well <br /> for the 10.1-acre land application area. Well W-5 is located downgradient of the 10.1-acre land <br /> application area in Kleinfelder's groundwater elevation contour maps. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> 0 Recycled Paper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.