My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE CASE 2
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LATHROP
>
1250
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0521881
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2019 1:25:48 PM
Creation date
8/5/2019 10:50:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0521881
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0014865
FACILITY_NAME
CALIFORNIA NATURAL PRODUCTS
STREET_NUMBER
1250
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
LATHROP
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19804001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1250 E LATHROP RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
811
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lynn Forcum 2 - 18 January 2005 <br /> • In general, staff does not agree with the interpretation of groundwater flow direction as presented <br /> in the Hydrogeologic Review and Request to Use W-4 Report. Staff's interpretation indicates a <br /> groundwater mound exists in the 10.1-acre land application area and Wells W-4 and W-5 are <br /> downgradient of the land application area. <br /> • The unlined irrigation canal east of the 16-acre land application area has inadequately addressed. <br /> The presence of the canal can have significant impact on interpretations of groundwater quality <br /> and flow direction. <br /> • The report does not present an analysis of chemical concentration trends. Such an analysis can <br /> be useful when considering if a well is located downgradient of a source area. <br /> A 17 August 2004 Request to Use W-4 as Upgradient Groundwater Monitoring Point Report prepared <br /> by Kleinfelder uses regional groundwater data and site specific groundwater elevation data to propose <br /> use of Well W-4 as the upgradient groundwater monitoring well. That well is not acceptable because it <br /> is located in the 10.1-acre land application area and is likely to have been impacted by the wastewater <br /> application there. <br /> Please submit a groundwater investigation workplan no later than 3 March 2005. The workplan shall <br /> present a plan to evaluate groundwater quality in the area of the 10.1-acre land application area including <br /> flow direction and quality and discuss the influence on groundwater quality that the South San Joaquin <br /> Irrigation District's canal and the wastewater application has or may have on groundwater flow direction <br /> and quality. The workplan shall be prepared by a California licensed Engineer or Geologist and shall be <br /> consistent with Attachment A,Requirements for Monitoring Well Installation Workplan and <br /> Monitoring Well Installation Reports. <br /> The RWD will be considered incomplete until the background groundwater quality at the 10.1-acre land <br /> application area is characterized. Furthermore, wastewater may not be applied to land application areas <br /> that are not described in California Natural Product's existing WDRs. <br /> If you have any questions on this request for an RWD and groundwater investigation workplan, please <br /> telephone me at(916)464-4616. <br /> TIMO R. O'BRIEN <br /> Waste Discharge to Land Unit <br /> cc: Mike Huggins, San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department, Stockton <br /> enc: Form 200 <br /> Additional Questions <br /> Attachment A <br /> NlUelfiOEnrn .J.,., al Nal PmEuclylFartwn 22 Ln 05.d. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.