Laserfiche WebLink
II` <br /> I <br /> I <br /> The boreholes were drilled with truck mounted hollow stem auger drilling equipment. All drilling <br /> equipment and sampling tools were cleaned prior to arriving, between driving samples and before <br /> leaving the site. The augers were advanced to the desired depth interval, and the well installation <br /> proceeded. Drill cuttings were drummed and left on-site. The boreholes were logged below the <br /> excavation backfill using the Unified Soil Classification System under the supervision of a <br /> registered geologist. <br /> 2.0 Monitoring WejJla 'on and-Construction <br /> Two monitoring wells were installed. These wells were placed within 5 feet of the original locations <br /> of MW-3 and MW-9. The new well designations for these wells in this report and on the figures <br /> enclosed are - <br /> MW 3R and <br /> MW-9R <br /> The wells were cased with Sch. 40 PVC casing,threaded together; glues were not used. The slotted <br /> interval used a 0.020-inch slot and the annular space around the slots was backfilled with a-2/12 <br /> size sand. Previous experience has shown this to be a reliable well design in fine grained and <br /> stratified depositional environments,and this is similar to the original well design. <br /> Once the aquifer strata were defined,the casing was lowered to the bottom of the borehole, leaving a <br /> slotted interval above the occurrence of groundwater to observe for floating product. The sand pack <br /> wasa laced to int about two feet above the <br /> P 1� slots. A bentonite seal was placed atop the sand <br /> pack <br /> to prevent grout invasion. A cement grout annular seal was placed atop the bentonite using a tremie <br /> line,filling from the bottom to top of the borehole annular space. Traffic rated wellhead access <br /> boxes and security devices graded for positive drainage away completed the wellheads. <br /> i <br /> 10—M-opitoring Well &mpling and DevelgMellt <br /> The monitoring wells were developed to remove the drilling muck, grade the sand pack and provide <br /> a more complete hydraulic connection to the aquifer. Well development proceeded after the well <br /> annular seal set(at least 48 hours). A well development log was kept of the well volumes removed <br /> until the water was relatively clear and the amount of sand pumped is minimal. The wells were <br /> allowed to recover for at least 72 hoursrior .to sampling. <br /> P P g <br /> 4.0 Well CasingElevation urve <br /> The monitoring well casing elevations were surveyed to the existing monitoring well site mean sea <br /> level elevation datum so accurateoundwater elevations and flow gradient could uld be measured in the <br /> new wells. <br /> SECTION 2. r <br /> Quarterly Monitoring Well Sampling <br /> 2.1 Monitoring Well Sampling Methods <br /> The site was sampled on November 19, 2004. The attached tables lists the wells historic and <br /> currentoundwate <br /> gr r level data (see Table 1, the site was not sampled due to soil excavation in the <br /> third quarter). The contract sampler proceeded to purge well volumes of groundwater using a <br /> submersible electric purging pump or bailer(a volume calculation was done for each well following <br /> sounding measurements). Conductivity, pH, and water temperature measurements were obtained <br /> between each well volume purge, and these were noted on the attached groundwater sampling <br /> information sheets. Once:these readings stabilized after two consecutive purge volumes, aquifer <br /> water was assumed to be entering the well. When the well recovered to about 80% of the initial <br /> water level,the sample was collected. Purge water was stored on-site in drums. The well sampling <br /> information sheets are attached. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />