Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Vicki McCartney <br /> January 22, 2004 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> stored in DOT-approved, 55-gallon drums pending disposal. Borings will be backfilled to the ground <br /> surface with neat cement grout. <br /> One discrete groundwater le will be collect <br /> g► sample from each boring for laboratory analysis. The samples <br /> p <br /> will be collected by driving the sampler to the desired depth and exposing the screen to the formation. The i <br /> groundwater sample will be collected using a length of polytetrafloroethylene(PTFE) tubing equipped with <br /> a stainless steel bottom check valve. The tubing will be inserted into the probe rods and pushed to the <br /> bottom of the sampler at the desired depth., The groundwater sample will be brought.to the surface by <br /> gripping the top of the tubing and rapidly moving the tubing up and down creating a positive displacement <br /> effect, thereby forcing the water sample to the surface where itwill be collected directly into the sample <br /> I <br /> containers. <br /> All sampling and drilling equipment will be washed thoroughly with laboratory-grade detergent and water <br /> between uses to minimize the potential fore cross contamination. All field work will be conducted in <br /> accordance with the Site Safety Plan on file at EHD. <br /> Groundwater samples and selected soil samples from each boring will be submitted for analysis of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) using EPA method 8015B; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, <br /> xylenes (BTEX) using EPA method 8021B; and oxygenated gasoline additives, including the lead <br /> scavengers ethylene dibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (12-DCA) using EPA method 8260B. The <br /> detection limit for 1,2-DCA will be 0.5 micrograms per liter,'(pgll), which is equal to the maximum <br /> contaminant level for drinking water adopted by the California Department of Health Services. Selection of <br /> soil samples for laboratory analysis will be based on field evidence of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination <br /> such as discoloration, odors, and photoionization detector (PID) readings, as well as lithologic changes. If <br /> no evidence of contamination is noted in the field, samples from the capillary fringe and/or the bottom of the <br /> boring(s)will be submitted for analysis. <br /> A technical report describing field activities, analytical results, conclusions and recommendations will be <br /> submitted to Souza II LLC, EHD, and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley <br /> Region (RWQCB). The report will include a recalculation of the hydrocarbon mass with the inclusion of the <br /> results of soil samples collected from the proposed boring advanced through former Tank 4 location. A sample <br /> previously collected beneath the former Tank 4 location(TS2 T4-13E)contained 1700 milligrams per kilogram <br /> (mg/kg) TPHg. The report will also include a discussion of potential contaminant transport in shallow <br /> groundwater beneath the site. <br /> Please contact John Lane or Greg Stab] at your convenience;if you have any questions or comments <br /> regarding this workplan. <br /> Respectfully, ��ckSD GO,a <br /> Ground Zero Analysis,Inc. <br /> jOHN P. <br /> LANI" o Ili. <br /> John P.Lane N No. 6795 `} <br /> CA Registered Geologist No. 6795 • � 1E:: <br /> JPL GF C ��F <br /> cc: Mr. James Barton,RWQCB <br /> ` -Mr. Mike Souza, Souza II LLC w w - .mak x - -r <br /> F <br /> G:IGROUNDZE15ouza\Workplanslsouzawp0104.doc _ <br /> r U t <br /> s; <br />