Laserfiche WebLink
+ Tom Gau, Senior Civil Ligineer <br /> May 4, 1998 " <br /> Page 5 <br /> E will ensure that sewer connection fees are paid in conjunction with building <br /> permit issuance and the Municipal Utilities Department shall monitor the <br /> F implementation of the RWCF Staged Expansion Project and confirm that <br /> ri <br /> said project remains on schedule. <br /> . Impacts on Collection System Capacity <br /> As previously discussed, the proposed project lies within the service area <br /> of Collection System No. 8. This collection system (South Stockton Sewer) <br /> was constructed using financing obtained by the establishment of <br /> Community Facilities District 90-1 (CI=D 90-1). The proposed development <br /> can be adequately served by this collection system once the appropriate <br /> sewer trunk lines are extended to the point of connection identified above. <br /> The owners and developers of the Stockton Metropolitan Airport Project will <br /> agree to annex to, and pay any and all sewer collection system fees or in- <br /> lieu fees established for CFD 90-1. <br /> ' Level of Significance: Potentially Significant <br /> Mitigation Measures: The owners, developers and/or successors-in-interest ((OrlilhuF <br /> shall be responsible for the following mitigation measures: <br /> 1. Prior to issuance of building permits, annex to, and pay the <br /> applicable sewer connection fees required for Community Facilities <br /> District 90-1. <br /> Mitigation Implementation and Monitoring: <br /> Implementation and Monitoring: The Community Development Department <br /> will ensure that CFD 90-1 sewer connection fees are paid in conjunction with <br /> ` building permit issuance. <br /> x Significance After Vitigation: Less than Significant <br /> 4. (Page 6-16) In order to help mitigate the loss of oak trees, the paved route shown in Figure <br /> F3-4 between the 27 acre air cargo area and the regional airport terminal should be realigned <br /> F so that the oak trees on the 38 acre terminal expansion area north of this paved route <br /> becomes part of the open area north of Detention Basin No.1. <br /> r5. (Page 6-21) What if the SJMSCP is not implemented? An alternative mitigation is needed to <br /> cover such an occurrence. <br /> 1. <br /> i6. (Page 6-2.1) Need a mitigation measure for the loss or disturbance of the ground-nesting -2Q <br /> M burrowing owls. Will there be replacement burrows and/or relocation of owls? <br /> i 7. Public Works staff has significant concerns regarding the lack of mitigation proposed, as well <br /> as with the roadway improvement assumptions. In addition, the transportation and circulation <br /> section of the subject document is not satisfactory for City of Stockton General Plan <br /> Famendment purposes. Staff prepared the following comments to outline their concerns: <br /> t , <br />