Laserfiche WebLink
ii <br /> Tom Gain, Senior Civil Engineer <br /> May 4, 1998 <br /> Page 6 <br /> a. Table 1-1. Page 3 of 5. Impacts T-1 and T-2. It has not been demonstrated that the <br /> 4 Level of Significance of the impact of increases in traffic are "Less that Significant" f•Z�� <br /> k' before mitigation. The document should identify the assumed roadway improvements <br /> as mitigation measures. Further, 1) this document must identify that the project <br /> r` proponents shall be responsible for their proportionate share of the improvements <br /> 1 needed to mitigate to LOS D including a proportionate share of those improvements 90 <br /> needed <br /> assumed to be in place in 2015 as well as those needed to mitigate the impacts under <br /> '+ cumulative conditions, and 2) as there is no existing funding mechanism for roadway, <br /> improvements under the City's jurisdiction applied to County projects, a mechanism for �•Z�C <br /> financial exchange must be clearly identified. <br /> b. As indicated on Page 3-6, the Master Plan assumes that certain roadway improvements <br /> would be in place. None of the roadway improvements identified to be in place in 2015 <br /> are fully funded. The Transportation and Circulation Section should address bullet 4 �•22 <br /> Ft of the March 29, 1996, letter from Dana Cowell, Caltrans District 10, relative to funding <br /> concerns and timing of construction. <br /> FC. The forecasts for this report should be reviewed for consistency with the Arch 1-Z3 <br /> Road/State Route 99 and the Arch-Sperry Specific Road Plan projects. <br /> I <br /> F d. The location and proposed use of detention/retention basins and ponds as shown in the <br /> ' report may present a serious safety problem. This could lead to waterfowl habitat <br /> � development and increased wildlifelavigation conflicts. Historically, detention basins in <br /> the vicinity of the airport have been disallowed. This report should include the following <br /> discussion: <br /> FMansville Ditch drains into French Camp Slough. French Camp Slough is <br /> I presumed to have no available storm drainage capacity. The applicant <br /> 1 shall perform the hydraulic analysis to demonstrate that either 1)the project I-2r7 <br /> F will not raise the existing maximum water surface elevation, or 2) the <br /> project will not cause water level to encroach into the freeboard space <br /> required by FEMA regulations. <br /> Again, the City`of Stockton would like to thank you for the opportunity to comment on this DEIR. <br /> Should you have any questions or need clarification, please feel free to contact Senior Planner <br /> Dianne Keil Smith at 937-8266 or myself at 937-8444. <br /> F <br /> C <br /> JOHN CARLSON, DIRECTOR <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> JC:sI <br /> M Attachments <br /> emc: Dwane Milnes, City Manager w/o attachments <br /> Jim`.Giottonini, Public Works Director w/o attachments <br /> i Morris Allen, MUD Director w/o attachments <br /> { i Tim Gallagher, Parks & Recreation Director w/o attachments <br /> Sam Mah, Deputy Director, Planning w/o attachments <br /> TAPlANNINGVCMEMOSWROEIR.OKS <br /> Fill <br />