Laserfiche WebLink
:I <br /> j� <br /> pR4U�H. C` SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> ' 1810 E- MAZELTON AVE„ STOCKTON,CA 95205 <br /> DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PHONE: (209)468-3120 <br /> PLANNING PHONE: (209(468-3120 <br /> BUILDING PHONE: (209)468-3123 <br /> NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION PHONE: (209)468-30201A W <br /> f <br /> r. <br /> December 21, 1990 F tweod <br /> le <br /> �i <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Development Committee <br /> FROM: Richard Larrouy, Associate Plann r� <br /> SUBJECT: P,RE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION <br /> APPLICATION NO. SU-91-9 (TRACT NO. 2461) <br /> OF ANGELO FLOR (C/O MICHAEL K. ATHERTON) <br /> II <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> The <br /> ---------------------------------------------------- <br /> The applicant has submitted a Major Subdivision pre-application to <br /> subdivide a124 . 65-acre site into 95 single family residential lots. <br /> The following pre-application comments are intended to inform the <br /> applicant of preliminary. considerations an General Plan and zoning <br /> consistency;', public and subdivision design/improvement <br /> requirement's, and preliminary design constraints. <br /> General Plan/Zoning Considerations: <br /> The site 'si current General Plan designation is Low Density <br /> Residential'', which specifies a density of one to six dwelling units <br /> per gross acre and a population density of approximately three to <br /> eighteen persons per gross acre. The proposal to create ninety- <br /> five residential lots on this 24 . 65-acre site, resulting in a <br /> density of (,,approximately 3 . 85 dwelling units per gross acre, is <br /> consistent :,,with the General Plan density requirements for this <br /> designation. <br /> The project` site is zoned R1-8, which requires 8, 000 square-foot <br /> minimum parcel sizes and minimum lot widths of sixty-five feet. <br /> Eleven of the lots shown on the tentative map submitted with the <br /> pre-application (Lot Nos. 34 , 35, 36, 37, 42 , 43 , 44 , 45, 55, 56, <br /> and 74) do not appear to meet the required minimum width. <br /> 1 <br /> • II <br />