Laserfiche WebLink
parcel and would provide better traffic circulation. For these reasons, Alternative 3 was <br /> selected as the environmentally superior "build" alternative. <br /> Findin s for 16 "No Project" Alternative. Under the "no-project" alternative, there <br /> would be no improvements to the existing . roadway system, although routine <br /> maintenance activities would be continued. With respect to construction disturbance, <br /> land use and socioeconomic effects of right-of-way acquisition, the "no project" is <br /> environmentally superior. However, without improvements, traffic in the South Stockton <br /> Planning Area would operate at unacceptable levels of service and air quality would <br /> likely be worse. Although the "no-project" alternative was identified by the City of <br /> Stockton as the environmentally superior alternative, it does not improve traffic <br /> circulation and is therefore unacceptable. <br /> Table 1 <br /> SummarV Evaluation of the.Three"Build" Alternatives <br /> Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 <br /> Environmental Impacts <br /> Earth Resources Same Same Same <br /> Water Resources Same -Same Same <br /> Light and Glare'7. Same a .«-:;Same ,. :Same <br /> Utilities and Services Same - Same Same <br /> Aesthetics , Sarin i,+. t ., .=Same` _ _ ::� s F Same <br /> -.Air Quality _ _;,-. _ ".- .:Not Preferred T.. Sll()htly Preferred . _.Preferred <br /> Noise �Sli htl Preferred _+Sli' htl 'Pre#erred �`' =.Preferred <br /> I Land Use/Agricultural Use.;: n.,-Slightly Preferred . ^Not Preferred - ;Preferred _ <br /> Biological Resources 'Same Same " Same <br /> Hazardous Materials R .Same 'Same Same <br /> Cultural Resources Preferred SliohFly Preferred Preferred <br /> TraqEpotfationlMiculation <br /> Traffic Operations Not Preferred SlI htl Preferred Preferred <br /> Transit Circulation Not Preferred Slightly Preferred Preferred <br /> L—Safety Not Preferred Slightly Preferred - Preferred <br /> I <br /> Redd+ng,CA. <br /> 15 <br />