SU0007861 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

n B. The EIR, on page 111-20 indicates how the facility controls the track out of mud from the facility on to Austin Road. The EHD has received multiple complaints, in the recent past, regarding the mud that is tracked out on the road from the facility. The mitigations listed in the EIR are not adequate. Revise to include additional measures to control the track out of mud. 9. The EIR, on page 111-24 discusses the relocation of the South Fork of Little John Creek. The creek will be directly down wind of the landfill. What measures will be taken to keep litter out of the new flood-plain. 10. The EIR, on page III-24 describes a process called Solidification. The process as described in the EIR will take Alternative Daily Cover Materials (ADC) and mix them with high liquid content sludge and food waste. The ad mixture is then proposed for re-use as ADC in the landfill. • If the admixture coming out of the process contains food waste then it cannot be used as ADC. • If the admixture contains sludge then a site specific demonstration project will be required prior to approval. 11. The EIR, on page 111-25 proposes to use Treaded Auto Shredder Waste (TASW) as an ADC material that would be used in the solidification process. • This is not allowed. The TASW is basically a sponge and would release most if not all of the moisture that is absorbed when placed and compacted as cover. • TASW is allowed to be accepted at class 11 and class ill landfills under a waiver issued by Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC). The additional treatment or additive to the TASW will compromise the original waiver and may not allow it to be accepted at the Forward Inc. Landfill. 12. The EIR, on page 111-25 indicates that ADC material will be mixed with high moisture wastes and then transferred to the landfill for disposal or possible re-use when the approvals for re- use are attained by the operator. The transfer of materials from one facility to the other must be reported in tonnage and vehicle counts. 13. The EIR, on page 11-26 indicates that the tonnage will be increased by 500 tons per day so that the Resource Recovery Facility (RRF) daily tonnage will be separate from the landfills daily tonnage. Will there be any vehicle numbers associated with the RRF? 14. The EIR, on page III-26 indicates that there will be 40,000 gallons of high moisture content waste accepted at the facility each day. Will this waste be incorporated into the 500 tons per day that the EIR proposes to be associated with the RRF? It also needs to be reported and assessed as tons per day. Amend the EIR to reflect this. 15_ The EIR, on page IV-13-1 is the traffic study. The project is proposing to increase the vehicle trips from 620 vehicles per day to 960 vehicles per day. The study discusses traffic offsite. The facility shall study onsite traffic as it relates to site equipment capacity, roads size, size of working face, number of personnel, and time spent quelling at the scale. To determine safe levels of traffic that the site can handle. This would include activities at the RRF. Amend the EIR to include this information. 16. The traffic study was conducted in February 2009. This is in the winter months. The area is primarily agriculture in nature. Was there any seasonal variation considered when evaluating the vehicle traffic in the area? i