Laserfiche WebLink
Page 99 <br /> Current Setting Conditions <br /> The following discussion updates the 1994 EIR description of groundwater incorporating information <br /> from the more recent studies listed above. All well sampling locations described herein are indicated on <br /> Figure K-1. <br /> Regional Groundwater <br /> Since 1994,above average rainfall and better groundwater discharge management have resulted in more <br /> stable groundwater levels. <br /> Site Hydrologic Setting and Groundwater Movement <br /> The sediments underlying the Austin Road Landfill are consistent with the regional geology consisting of <br /> interlayered sand,silt, and clay with occasional beds of coarse sand and gravel. The 'interpretation of the <br /> hydrogeology in the various investigations completed since the 1989 SWAT investigation are consistent, <br /> and characterize the sediments as fluvial (river-borne)deposits(Kleinfelder, 1988;CDM, 1999A). <br /> Figures K-1,K-2,and K-3 show the landfill,monitoring well locations and downgradient receptors. <br /> Hydrogeologically the site is underlain mainly by clay and clayey sands in the area above the water table, <br /> down to about-40 feet sea level(MSL). The thickness of clay also varies near the landfill with more clay <br /> on the western side. Below the clay-rich interval is mostly interlayered sands and silts with occasional <br /> beds of clay. This is referred to as the intermediate zone. The only major occurrence of clay is an <br /> interval from-80 to-118 feet MSL noted in the MW-6 boring log. No other borehole logs show such a <br /> thick interval of clay;its extent near the landfill is unknown. <br /> The major water-bearing unit beneath the landfill appears to be the intermediate interval of sand between <br /> about-40 and-80 feet MSL. North of the landfill,the sand unit appears to thicken and is interbedded <br /> with silt beds(CDM, 1999A). The silt layers become thicker and more abundant north of ARL-IA where <br /> there appears to be three distinct sand units beneath-40 feet MSL. The shallowest unit does not appear to <br /> be in hydraulic connection with the underlying intermediate sand unit because it pinches out between data <br /> points ARL-1C and MW-14 reported by CDM(1999A). This interpretation is supported by their being <br /> no trichloroethene(TCE),tetrachloroethene(PCE),or other compounds being detected in the sample <br /> from this unit(ARL-IA-GW-85). The only water quality data from the intermediate sand unit was <br /> collected from ARL-3A(sample ARL-3A-105). No organic compounds were detected in this sample, <br /> though it is unclear if this is due to hydraulic isolation or distance from the source (CDM, 1999A). The <br /> lowest unit has shown detectable WE and PCE,suggesting it is in hydraulic connection with the upper <br /> unit. <br /> The depths to water measured in the borings installed by CDM in 1998 ranged from 61 to 84.6 feet bgs or <br /> -24 to-42 feet MSL. Since 19%,water levels have been measured between-20 and-43 feet MSL. <br /> Most measurements were between-28 and-43 feet MSL,with the exception of several high <br /> measurements recorded at MW-2 and MW-5. <br /> Maximum PCE were reported in the monitoring wells north of the landfill,which are screened within the <br /> sand layer which extends over the 80 to 104 feet below ground surface(bgs)interval. The wells screened <br /> in this interval are MS-10,MW-11,MW-13, and MW-14. Most of the wells on the perimeter of the <br /> GRASSETTI ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING <br />