Laserfiche WebLink
Paige 86 <br /> Impact F.B.Construction activities in the North Branch of the South Fork of Little Johns Creek <br /> could result in significant adverse impacts to Sacramento River winter chinook salmon. <br /> Sacramento River winter chinook salmon is a federal and state=listed Endangered species. The National <br /> Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)has stated that this fish species could be present in Little Johns Creek at <br /> a nearby project site in the fall and winter months,but acknowledges that its presence would be unlikely <br /> (based on from Biological Impacts and Mitigations Proposed BNSFIntermodal Facility, Stockton, <br /> California dated March 23, 1999). Realigning the 7,600-foot reach of Little Johns Creek may have <br /> temporary impacts on this fish species.Potential impacts to Chinook from realignment of the creek <br /> include temporary disturbance to the creek resulting in a temporary loss of a potential migration corridor. <br /> The proposed mitigation would replace the 7,600-foot reach(with an on average 46-foot floodplain <br /> width)with a 7,800-foot reach(with a 200-1oot floodplain width)and riparian vegetation within a 220 <br /> foot on average meander. The widened floodplain width and enhanced riparian vegetation would be <br /> beneficial to fish species. <br /> No formal surveystliave been conducted for Sacramento River Winter Chinook Salmon in the reach of <br /> Little Johns Creek on the project site;however, an observation of this species has been documented <br /> (Nisperos,pers.'comm. with Mike Wood,September 23, 1999). Realignment and enhancement should <br /> reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. <br /> Mitigation Measure F.8. Implementation of the following mitigation would reduce impacts to <br /> Sacramento River winter chinook salmon to a level considered less than significant. <br /> F. (a) To avoid impacting Sacramento River winter chinook salmon in Little Johns Creek, all proposed <br /> work that would impact this creek should occur'in the summer months when this salmon would <br /> not be migrating/spawning in this creek. If work must occur during the fall/winter months,the <br /> National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)should be contacted for other possible mitigation <br /> requirements,''Other mitigation would include conducting turbidity studies to determine if the <br /> work would be detrimental to Sacramento River winter chinook salmon. Further mitigation for <br /> FF non-summer work would be in accordance with recommendations provided by NMFS. <br /> (b) The proposed mitigation would replace the 7,600-fo6t reach(with anon average 46 foot <br /> floodplain width)with a 7,800-foot reach(with a 200 foot floodplain width)and riparian <br /> F vegetation within a 220-foot on average meander. The widened floodplain width and enhanced <br /> riparian vegetation would be beneficial to fish species(see Impact B.1). The mitigation.listed <br /> above conducted in concert with any mitigation required by NMFS for work in the <br /> migration/spawning season would reduce impacts to this fish species to a level considered less <br /> than significant(taken from Biological Impacts and Mitigations Proposed BNSF Intermodal <br /> lr Facility, Stockton, California,March 23, 1999). <br /> Impact F.9. Construction activities in the North Branch of the South Fork of Little Johns Creek <br /> could result in significant adverse impacts to Sacramento River faMate-fall Chinook salmon. <br /> Sacramento River.FalU ate-Fall Chinook salmon was proposed for listing as Threatened in the Federal <br /> Register by National Marine Fisheries Service(NMFS)on February 26, 1998 and is a California Species <br /> 4 of Special Concern.As a proposed listed species,this salmon is not formally protected under the Federal <br /> Endangered Species Act. However, for planning purposes, it is prudent for project proponents to treat <br /> proposed listed species as though they were going to be listed. Finally,proposed listed species usually <br /> meet biological criteria to be classified as rare under.CEQA (Section 15380(b)). <br /> GRASSETTI ENT17RONMENTAL CONSULTING <br /> F <br />