Laserfiche WebLink
S <br /> Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page I1I-36 • <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> The office trailer,as shown on Figure III.0-2,would remain in this location until the easternmost <br /> cell that parallels Austin Road is constructed. At that time the office trailer would be relocated just <br /> north of WMU A, so that a sedimentation pond can be constructed in its place. The main entrance <br /> would remain in its current location,except for periods of time when refuse filling is occurring in <br /> the northeast or south infill. At these times the entrance/exit may be relocated to the north or south • <br /> landfill entrance/exit. The scales would be relocated depending on the entrance/exit being used • <br /> and would be sited in a location that allows sufficient space for queuing within the facility <br /> boundary. <br /> Once the South Fork is relocated,the existing permitted leachate/compost pond,WMU F South, <br /> would be relocated adjacent to the existing leachate pond,WMU F-North(see Figure III.0-3). The <br /> existing permitted sedimentation basin would be combined with the existing sedimentation basin <br /> located directly north of the existing leachate pond, WMU F-North(see Figure III.0-3). Closure and <br /> relocation of the leachate and sedimentation basin would be in accordance with applicable • <br /> regulations and as approved by the regulatory agencies. <br /> Continue Current Procedures and Activities <br /> Under the 2018 Expansion Project, other current Forward procedures and activities at the existing • <br /> Forward Landfill,would be continued without change. In general,procedures at the existing <br /> Forward Landfill that are appropriate to the Class II wastes currently disposed would be expanded <br /> to encompass the expanded landfill to allow disposal of Class II wastes in the entire landfill • <br /> development area. • <br /> G. OTHER RECENT AND PROPOSED PROJECTS AT THE FORWARD LANDFILL <br /> The 2013 FIR described three "recent and associated projects" of the proposed expansion: the • <br /> facility boundary revision; the Landfill Gas to Energy (LFGTE) Project; and the Revision of <br /> Waste Discharge Requirements. The facility boundary revision, approved January 6, 2011, <br /> added the 184 acres in the southwest portion of the site to the Forward Landfill facility <br /> boundary,but did not allow any landfill related activities on this parcel. The LFGTE Plant was . <br /> constructed in 2013 in the northeast portion of the landfill site, and is currently operated by <br /> Ameresco. <br /> In February 2014 the Regional Water Quality Control Board issued new Waste Discharge • <br /> Requirements (WDRs) R5-2014-0006 for the Forward Landfill which included, among other • <br /> modifications, lowering of base grades to the regulatory limit of five feet above the historical <br /> high groundwater level and the land application of cannery waste in the northern portion of the <br /> site (north of the North Fork of South Littlejohns Creek). . <br /> Since the 2013 EIR was prepared, two additional associated projects were proposed, as <br /> described below. <br /> Forward is proposing a bridge crossing on the North Fork of South Littlejohn Creek. The bridge <br /> crossing is to allow access to the existing permitted borrow area and to the cannery waste land <br />