Laserfiche WebLink
• Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page III-35 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> • wetland delineation 12 approximately 1.25 acres of jurisdictional wetlands exists within the <br /> • existing channel. The existing creek performs relatively well in terms of flood control.13 <br /> The creek relocation is intended to: (1)provide adequate flood control (i.e., to have capacity to <br /> i carry the 100-year flow within its banks),and (2)provide a stable channel design that meets or <br /> • exceeds the functions and values of the existing creek.Under the proposed relocation,the existing <br /> channel would be moved approximately 1,000 feet to the south to accommodate the further <br /> development of the Forward Landfill (see Figures III.0-4,III.0-5, and III.0-6). The relocated creek <br /> would be approximately 3,400 feet in length and would have greater flood control ability than the <br /> S existing channel.The new channel would be approximately 50 to 60 feet wide,within an <br /> • approximately 120-foot-wide creekside zone. <br /> The proposed relocation would create 1.41 acres of USCOE jurisdictional areas that are <br /> • inundated at a regular basis. To address Federal Aviation Administration(FAA)concerns <br /> • regarding creation of bird habitat, riparian habitat is proposed to be restored and/or created offsite <br /> • rather than being incorporated within the relocated creek channel. Potential offsite mitigation sites <br /> include Westervelt Environmental Services'Bullocks Bend Mitigation Bank and Wildlands' <br /> Fremont Landing Conservation Bank,both in Yolo County, and the National Fish and Wildlife <br /> • Foundations Sacramento District California In-Lieu Fee Program. <br /> Constructing the channel would require moving approximately 50,000 cubic yards of material. <br /> The creek relocation would use design and construction techniques similar to those used in the <br /> successful relocation of the North Fork of South Littlejohns Creek in 2002. Litter control in the <br /> • relocated creek would follow established litter control practices at the site. A combination of <br /> • monitored litter fences, screening,and litter pickers would be used. <br /> A new two-lane bridge("South Bridge")would cross the relocated creek from Austin Road, <br /> • consisting of a clear span with engineered concrete footings located in the creek embankment. <br /> • The bridge would be a concrete slab bridge or similar type construction. The bridge would be <br /> approximately 63 feet long by 28 feet wide, and allow for two twelve-foot-wide lanes with a <br /> two-foot shoulder. There would be one foot of freeboard between the 100-year water surface <br /> • and the bridge soffit. <br /> Construct Ancillary Facilities <br /> It is currently anticipated that refuse filling would continue on the northern portion of the site in <br /> • the valley between the former Austin Road Landfill and the original Forward Landfill and then in <br /> • the northeast infill. Development of the south infill would occur after realignment of the South <br /> Fork and completion of refuse filling in the northern area,except for the easternmost cell that <br /> parallels Austin Road. This easternmost cell would be reserved for operations soil management <br /> • until the remainder of the landfill is constructed. <br /> • Z Concept Design Report, South Branch of the South Fork ofLittle John Creek Relocation Project(Questa <br /> • Engineering Corp,2017) <br /> • 3 Project Description for Land Use Permit Application,Forward Landfill(Bryan A.Stirrat&Associates, 2008). <br />