SU0011836 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • • Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.A-19 Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Expansion Project As discussed under"San Joaquin County Zone Classification', above, the proposed project would be consistent with the site's AG-40 zoning. The proposed relocation of the South Fork of South Littlejohns Creek would relocate, without substantially altering, the open space and riparian habitat values of the existing alignment of the South Fork. In addition, by purchasing • off-site mitigation,the project would enhance open space and riparian habit at the mitigation • site, as discussed in Section F. Biological Resources. For these reasons, the proposed project would not conflict with goals, policies, and implementation measures of the General Plan. • General Plan Solid Waste Disposal Policies The proposed project would not conflict with Implementation Program IS-J of the San Joaquin County General Plan, which calls for mandatory waste collection and recycling. General Plan Agricultural Land Policies The proposed project's consistency with agricultural land policies is discussed in Impact A.2, • below. General Plan Fire Safety and Law Enforcement Policies The proposed project would not obviously conflict with the Fire Safety goal and policies of the • General Plan Public Health and Safety Element, including Policy PHS-4.1, which calls for a Community Wildfire Protection Plan, and Policy PHS-4.6, which advocates coordination among fire prevention agencies. • As discussed in I. Public Services and Utilities, Setting, Fire Protection and Emergency Medical • Services, and Impacts I.1, I.2, and I.3, the proposed project would be located within 4.0 miles of a fire station (Policy 4) and,incorporating mitigation measures identified in this SEIR, would provide adequate access and water supply (Policies 2 and 5). General Plan Hazardous Materials and Wastes Policies As discussed in E. Public Health and Safety,the proposed project, including mitigation . measures identified in this SEIR, would not obviously conflict with the Hazardous Materials • and Wastes goal and policies of the General Plan Public Health and Safety Element, including Policy PHS-7.2, which calls for avoidance of environmental contamination from hazardous materials;Policy PHS-7.3, which calls for appropriate use, storage, and disposal of hazardous is materials;Policy PHS-7.5, which calls for safe location of hazardous material use, storage, and • disposal:; and Policy PHS-7.9,which requires public disclosure of hazardous materials and • wastes. As discussed in E. Public Health and Safety and G. Hydrology and Water Quality, the proposed project would include mitigation measures to address air, water, and soil contamination issues • (Policy 7.2), and would be located away from population centers (Policy 7.5). The project would • comply with hazardous waste laws and regulations (Policies 7.3 and 7.9).