Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> • Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.A-25 <br /> Forward Inc.Landfill 2018 Expansion Project <br /> • have an adverse impact on Circle-to-Land procedures at SCK. <br /> The Initial Climb Area (ICA) associated with SCK's departure procedures wase analyzed, using <br /> SCK's standard Climb Gradient of 200 feet per Nautical Mile (NM) for aircraft departing <br /> • Runway 11L. Neither portion of the proposed project would penetrate this ICA or have an <br /> adverse impact on departure procedures at SCK. <br /> An analysis of SCK's Visual Flight Rule (VFR) Traffic Pattern Airspace was completed to <br /> determine the maximum elevation to which a landfill could be erected without impacting <br /> • aircraft operating in visual conditions at SCK. Neither portion of the proposed project would <br /> • penetrate the VFR Traffic Pattern for SCK. <br /> In summary, the proposed final grades of the 2018 Expansion Project would not(a)penetrate <br /> A obstruction criteria for Stockton Metropolitan Airport (SCK), (b) penetrate Obstacle Clearance <br /> • Surfaces (OCS) or Circle-to-Land Obstacle Clearance Surfaces (OCS), or have an adverse impact <br /> on arrival procedures at SCK, (c) have an adverse impact on departure procedures at SCK, or <br /> (d) penetrate the Visual Flight Rule (VFR) Traffic Pattern for SCK. (Williams Aviation <br /> Consultants, 2017). Therefore, the final grades of the proposed expansion project would have a <br /> • less-than-significant impact on safety due to conflict with FAR height limits or the airport <br /> • imaginary space. <br /> However, when the two expansion areas have been filled to an elevation near their permitted <br /> heights, equipment operating on top of the landfill could temporarily intrude into the conical <br /> • space. Forward would continue its procedure of submitting a Notice of Proposed Construction <br /> or Alteration (FAA Form 7460-1) at least 45 days prior to operation of any equipment that could <br /> temporarily intrude into the imaginary surface, as required by the Federal Aviation <br /> Administration (FAA) for all proposed construction or alterations that could intrude into the <br /> • airport imaginary surface. This would reduce the impact of operating equipment on the conical <br /> • space to a less-than-significant level. <br /> The impact of the 2018 Expansion Project on FAA height limits would be less than significant <br /> and no mitigation is required. <br /> Impact AA: The proposed project could increase bird hazards at the Stockton Metropolitan <br /> Airport(Revises 2013 EIR Impact A.Q. As discussed in Bird Strikes and Gull Control, in the <br /> Setting section above, the existing landfill has not generated significant bird strike hazards for <br /> • the Stockton Metropolitan Airport in the past from gulls or other bird species, and a bird control <br /> • program has been successful in controlling birds at the landfill. The proposed Project would <br /> continue to employ current bird control measures including properly compacting and covering <br /> wastes at the end of each day, and use of falcons,bird flares, whistles, and bombs. The <br /> maximum elevation of the expansion area would be approximately 200 feet above mean sea <br /> • level (MSL), lower than the permitted maximum height of 210 feet MSL for the existing <br /> Forward Landfill. As discussed above, the proposed expansion would not conflict with FAR <br /> height limits. However,both portions of the 2018 Expansion Project would have higher <br /> surfaces that could increase the hovering altitude of any birds attracted to the landfill, and thus <br /> • could create a hazard to aircraft. <br />