My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011836
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800090
>
SU0011836
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 10:35:38 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0011836
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800090
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336-
APN
20106003, -05, 18115007, -16
ENTERED_DATE
6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/15/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EHD COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\DRAFT SEIR-09-2018.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EIR-07-2018.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.A-27 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2015 Expansion Project <br /> • when they migrate to the area in the fall. The bird control program was shown to be effective at <br /> ` preventing gulls from feeding at, or otherwise using, the Forward Landfill. (Davis, 2017). <br /> A biologist from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection <br /> • Service, Wildlife Services visited the project site to evaluate aviation-related wildlife hazards <br /> • and current management practices, including the bird control program discussed above. After <br /> the visit, USDA Wildlife Services made recommendations for wildlife management at the <br /> landfill. (Odell,2011). In addition to compliance with FAA rules and regulations, the <br /> recommendations include: <br /> . • Review of all new landscaping/development plans for wildlife hazards <br /> • • Water management to eliminate standing water from the landfill whenever possible <br /> • • Vegetation management to eliminate brushy areas along ditches and streams <br /> • • Operation of wildlife hazard management patrols <br /> • Continuation of the current falconry-based bird control program at the landfill <br /> • Coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to develop a permit to reduce <br /> • hazards to aircraft from specific threatened and endangered species and species of <br /> • special concern <br /> As discussed in III. Project Description,Relocate South Fork of South Littlejohn Creek, riparian <br /> habitat is proposed to be restored and/or created offsite rather than being created within the <br /> • relocated creek channel,to address Federal Aviation Administration(FAA) concerns regarding <br /> creation of bird habitat. This would address the USDA Wildlife Services recommendations for <br /> review of new landscaping/development plans for wildlife hazards,water management to <br /> eliminate standing water from the landfill whenever possible,and vegetation management to <br /> • eliminate brushy areas along ditches and streams. <br /> Mitigation Measure A.1, above, incorporates the recommendations of USDA Wildlife Services, <br /> but excludes the USDA Wildlife Services recommendations for special-status bird species and the <br /> • removal of prey base for predatory birds and mammals, for reasons that are explained below. <br /> Large flocking birds (i.e. gulls, geese) are the species most associated with bird airstrikes.4 The <br /> proposed relocation of Littlejohns Creek would not result in a net increase in area of habitat for <br /> those bird species most associated with bird strike hazards for aircraft. Bird species such as gulls <br /> • and geese that pose the greatest risk for aviation at the landfill are the focus of the existing bird <br /> • control program. <br /> In addition to large flocking birds, raptors (birds of prey), which include special-status bird <br /> • species,may also be present in the project vicinity. Based on records of bird strikes, raptors are <br /> • much less likely to be involved in aircraft strikes than flocking birds such as gulls. The project site <br /> • is surrounded by agricultural land, which provides extensive habitat for the prey base (e.g., <br /> rodents) of raptors. An abundant supply of prey would therefore be available whether or not the <br /> • " Mike Wood,Biologist,Wood Biological Consulting,Inc., personal communication,September 12, 2011. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.