Laserfiche WebLink
Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.B-17 • <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Expansion Project • <br /> It should be noted that,based on a traffic turning movement count at the driveway, there are <br /> currently 25 trucks entering the site during the morning peak hour. Assuming a worse-case <br /> under the project conditions, with 620 truckloads per day, an estimated 66 trucks(130 passenger <br /> car equivalents)would enter the site during the morning peak hour. The landfill has the ability • <br /> to accommodate the traffic without creating queuing problem on the site or on Austin Road. • <br /> In the past, there had been queueing problems associate with the composting facility. The <br /> entrance to the composting facility was redesigned and the gates were moved approximately • <br /> 150 feet west of Austin Road. These gates open at approximately 7:00 a.m.,Monday through • <br /> Friday. There is currently no queuing on Austin Road at the reconfigured entrance to the <br /> composting facility. Neither the 2013 project nor the 2018 Expansion Project would change the <br /> gate configurations or opening procedures at the entrances, although eventually the composting • <br /> facility would either be eliminated or removed as that area is filled. This impact would be less • <br /> than significant and no mitigation would be required. • <br /> Impact B.5. Potential Project Impacts on Bicycles. (Same As 2013 EIR Impact B.4): <br /> The 2018 Transportation Impact Assessment found that the previous analysis of bicycle <br /> impacts also would apply to the 2018 Expansion Project. <br /> Since no bicycle facilities currently exist in the study area, no impact on bicyclists or bicycle <br /> facilities are expected. It is possible that added Forward Landfill truck traffic outside the study • <br /> area may overlap with bikeways or bicycle usage. However, the added trips would disperse to • <br /> many roadways outside the study area, and it is not expected that the increase on any <br /> individual roadway would create to a significant negative impact. This impact would be less <br /> than significant and no mitigation would be required. • <br /> Impact B.6. Potential Project Impacts on Public Transit. (Same As 2013 EIR Impact B.5): <br /> The 2018 Transportation Impact Assessment found that the previous analysis of transit <br /> impacts also would apply to the 2018 Expansion Project. <br /> There is no transit service in the study area;thus, the project would not create any impacts on • <br /> existing transit service. The nature of the proposed project is such that it would not create any <br /> significant demand for new transit service. This impact would be less than significant and no <br /> mitigation would be required. • <br /> Impact B.7. Cumulative Development Conditions Intersection Impacts (Revises 2013 EIR <br /> Impacts B.6 and B.7) <br /> Two cumulative scenarios are described in this section. The first cumulative condition is <br /> composed of existing traffic conditions plus traffic generated by previously approved projects <br /> likely to be constructed in the near term. This near-term condition is referred to as Existing Plus <br /> Approved Projects (EPAP) conditions. The second cumulative scenario is a long-term forecast <br /> of traffic conditions in the year 2035. Both conditions assume full operation of the existing • <br />