My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0011836
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800090
>
SU0011836
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/18/2023 10:35:38 AM
Creation date
9/4/2019 10:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0011836
PE
2656
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800090
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336-
APN
20106003, -05, 18115007, -16
ENTERED_DATE
6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
RECEIVED_DATE
8/15/2023 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EHD COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\DRAFT SEIR-09-2018.PDF \MIGRATIONS\A\AUSTIN\9999\PA-1800090\SU0011836\EIR-07-2018.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Page IV.D-16 <br /> Forward Inc. Landfill 2018 Revised Project <br /> • <br /> • Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Appendix G,the SJVAPCD has established thresholds of <br /> • significance that may be relied upon in assessing construction impacts, project operations and <br /> cumulative impacts. <br /> • <br /> • The SJVAPCD's GAMAQI includes significance criteria for evaluating construction emissions, <br /> • operational-phase emissions from permitted equipment and activities, and operational-phase <br /> emissions from non-permitted equipment and activities. Construction emissions, operational- <br /> phase emissions from permitted equipment and activities, and operational-phase emissions <br /> • from non-permitted equipment and activities are evaluated separately and compared to the <br /> • significance criteria. Non-permitted equipment and activities include on-road mobile sources <br /> • and off-road equipment and do not include permitted equipment/activities (stationary sources) <br /> covered under permit with the SJVAPCD. For this analysis, the project would be considered to <br /> • have a significant effect on the environment if it would exceed the following thresholds: <br /> • • Cause a net increase in pollutant emissions of reactive organic gases (ROG) or NO, <br /> • exceeding 10 tons per year. <br /> • • Cause a net increase in pollutant emissions of PM,o or PM2.5 exceeding 15 tons per year. <br /> • Cause a net increase in pollutant emissions of SO,exceeding 27 tons per year. <br /> • • Cause a net increase in pollutant emissions of CO exceeding 100 tons per year. <br /> • Cumulative Impacts <br /> According to the SJVAPCD GAMAQI, a cumulative impact occurs when two or more <br /> individual effects, considered together, are considerable or would compound or increase other <br /> environmental impacts. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively <br /> • significant impacts,meaning that the project's incremental effects are considerable when <br /> • viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, and probable future projects. Notably, <br /> any project that would individually have a significant air quality impact would also be <br /> • considered to have a significant cumulative air quality impact. According to the SJVAPCD <br /> • GAMAQI, cumulative impacts should be assessed for ozone, PMlo, CO and TAC. <br /> Greenhouse Gases <br /> • The project would be considered to have a significant impact if the project would be in conflict <br /> • with State plans, policies and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, <br /> • such as AB 32, with the assumption that State plans, policies, and regulations, such as AB 32, <br /> will be successful in reducing GHG emissions and reducing the cumulative GHG emissions <br /> • statewide by 2020 and beyond. It is important that the State has taken these measures,because <br /> no project individually could have a major impact(either positively or negatively) on the global <br /> • concentration of GHG. <br /> • Impacts and Mitigation Measures <br /> w <br /> • This impact section evaluates the activities described in the Project Description that could <br /> • potentially result in impacts to air quality, odors, and climate change based on the conditions of <br /> the project area. The project would add 8.1 million cubic yards of landfill capacity versus the 32 <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.